April 2009 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Apr 1 06:11:46 EDT 2009
Ending: Fri Apr 24 14:24:33 EDT 2009
Messages: 150

• [Scspamcop] Re: Hotpatch Maintenance Monday March 30   Chris F. Willoughby
• [Scspamcop] Re: Hotpatch Maintenance Monday March 30   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Hotpatch Maintenance Monday March 30   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Hotpatch Maintenance Monday March 30   Chris F. Willoughby
• [Scspamcop] Re: Hotpatch Maintenance Monday March 30   Chris F. Willoughby
• [Scspamcop] Similar but not exact..   Chris F. Willoughby
• [Scspamcop] Re: Similar but not exact..   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: - RIPE linky   Chris F. Willoughby
• [Scspamcop] Re: - RIPE linky   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] 0.7645335 Now Click Here To See ... 0.586996   iwantsex at 0.0529294nowathome.com
• [Scspamcop] 4.428142E-02 Have To See This ... 0.5503491   iwantsex at 0.6490722nowathome.com
• [Scspamcop] 0.7281439 Look Inside And Realize That Dream ... 1.249468E-02   iwantsex at 0.1874411nowathome.com
• [Scspamcop] 0.9174165 Look Inside Now For It ... 0.3980764   iwantsex at 0.5476151nowathome.com
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is the Spamcop server time off or parser screwed up?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] ******* Outlook users please read ********   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   jg
• [Scspamcop] Why does SC ignore hyperlink?   Patto
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Patto
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Lou
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Trent
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Ant
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] minor formatting problem for quick reporting response   Robert Blair
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   RW
• [Scspamcop] Re: Maybe this has been covered before: Gmail headers?   RW
• [Scspamcop] Re: minor formatting problem for quick reporting response   RW
• [Scspamcop] autocad electrical 2010 autodesk full download crack torrent rapidshare 53130464516561850074   autodesk autocad electrical 2010 full download
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   jg
• [Scspamcop] Why no Chinese or Japanese blocking?   Peter Pearson
• [Scspamcop] 0.4296018 Now Click Here To See ... 0.7139527   iwantsex at 0.1544783nowathome.com
• [Scspamcop] 0.3155381 Now We Can Help Each Other ... 0.6252967   iwantsex at 0.7494276nowathome.com
• [Scspamcop] 0.6691131 Realize The Pleasure ... 0.4661678   iwantsex at 0.9829168nowathome.com
• [Scspamcop] SpamCop Spammer from Verizon   David H. Lipman
• [Scspamcop] Re: SpamCop Spammer from Verizon   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Why no Chinese or Japanese blocking?   Wazoo
• [Scspamcop] Re: Why no Chinese or Japanese blocking?   Michael R N Dolbear
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   RW
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   jg
• [Scspamcop] 4.098356E-03 Now We Can Help Each Other ... 0.4593505   0.3591734realizeitistrue at 0.9252839now.com
• [Scspamcop] Re: minor formatting problem for quick reporting response   Robert Blair
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] OT Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: OT Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] Re: Why no Chinese or Japanese blocking?   Peter Pearson
• [Scspamcop] OT Re: OT Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Why does SC ignore hyperlink?   Patto
• [Scspamcop] Re: OT Re: OT Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: Why no Chinese or Japanese blocking?   Patto
• [Scspamcop] Re: Why does SC ignore hyperlink?   RandallW
• [Scspamcop] Host www.greatquiet.com (checking ip) IP not found ; www.greatquiet.com discarded as fake.   NowhereMan
• [Scspamcop] reporting error on my side   Nic K. Mowe
• [Scspamcop] Re: Host www.greatquiet.com (checking ip) IP not found ; www.greatquiet.com discarded as fake.   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] devnull for complaints to Powercomm   RandallW
• [Scspamcop] Re: devnull for complaints to Powercomm   bar0
• [Scspamcop] Forum and Newsgroup links removed from SC Help page   David Topping
• [Scspamcop] Is SpamCop parsing this correctly?   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is SpamCop parsing this correctly?   David Bolt
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is SpamCop parsing this correctly?   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: devnull for complaints to Powercomm   Patto
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is SpamCop parsing this correctly?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is SpamCop parsing this correctly?   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: devnull for complaints to Powercomm   bar0
• [Scspamcop] spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Jay Teutenberg
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Why no Chinese or Japanese blocking?   Michael R N Dolbear
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Patto
• [Scspamcop] Planned Maintenance Window - Thursday, April 16, 2009   RW
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: reporting error on my side   RW
• [Scspamcop] Phishing of spamcop users resumed   Peter Pearson
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing of spamcop users resumed   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Patto
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Tim McGraw
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Karl-Josef Ziegler
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Karl-Josef Ziegler
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Jay Teutenberg
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Jay Teutenberg
• [Scspamcop] Re: Forum and Newsgroup links removed from SC Help page   David Topping
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Tim McGraw
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Tim McGraw
• [Scspamcop] Re: Forum and Newsgroup links removed from SC Help page   RW
• [Scspamcop] Re: Forum and Newsgroup links removed from SC Help page   Wazoo
• [Scspamcop] Is the parser correctly targetting the source of the spamitem in question?   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: Forum and Newsgroup links removed from SC Help page   RW
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is the parser correctly targetting the source of the spamitem in question?   RW
• [Scspamcop] Re: Forum and Newsgroup links removed from SC Help page   David Topping
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry, this email is too old to file a spam report...   Patto
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is the parser correctly targetting the source of the spamitem in question?   Steve Baker
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is SpamCop parsing this correctly?   Steve Baker
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is SpamCop parsing this correctly?   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] SPAMCOP appears NOT to be popping   Joe Gill
• [Scspamcop] Did SC surrend in reporting spam-related sites?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Did SC surrend in reporting spam-related sites?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Karl-Josef Ziegler
• [Scspamcop] Re: URL's in body not parsed?   Farelf
• [Scspamcop] Re: SPAMCOP appears NOT to be popping   Antispam Knight
• [Scspamcop] phatservers.net   Antispam Knight
• [Scspamcop] Re: phatservers.net   Lou
• [Scspamcop] ConstantContact   John Aldrich
• [Scspamcop] Re: ConstantContact   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   John Aldrich
• [Scspamcop] Re: ConstantContact   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: ConstantContact   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: ConstantContact   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: ConstantContact   Joe Gill
• [Scspamcop] Re: ConstantContact   John Aldrich
• [Scspamcop] Re: ConstantContact   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: SPAMCOP appears NOT to be popping   Jim
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   John Aldrich
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Jay Teutenberg
• [Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: spamcop thinks my ips from 5 years ago are still mine   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: acceptable abuse addresses from RIR listings   Tim McGraw

Last message date: Fri Apr 24 14:24:33 EDT 2009
Archived on: Fri Apr 24 14:25:08 EDT 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...