[Scspamcop] Re: ******* Outlook users please read ********

[Ellen]

Patto wrote:
> jg wrote:
>> On 04/06/2009 07:32 AM Ellen scribbled:
>>
>>> jg wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd call that timely, no offense to you Ellen...
>>>
>>> ????
>>>
>>>
>>> Ellen
>>>
>> What I was referring to was the fact that this is 2009 and you are
>> referring to Outlook 2003 and 2007 - seems a tad late for someone to be
>> discovering this now.
> 
> I think this is a very rare occurrence; I have been forwarding Outlook 
> 2003 messages as attachments since - well, you guess it - and I have 
> never had any problem with it.

  I doubt that it is rare -- I suspect it is happening for all spam 
forwarding for Outlook 2003 and 2007 *however* depending on how the 
headers are scrambled the results of the parse may be more or less 
accurate ...

And indeed it would be useful for anyone with outlook 2003/2007 posting 
to this thread to do an imspection of the original headers as revealed 
by looking at them in Outlook vs the headers once they are forwarded as 
an attachment and report back ...


Ellen
SpamCop