September 2008 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Sep 1 11:14:48 EDT 2008
Ending: Tue Sep 30 19:04:59 EDT 2008
Messages: 231

• [Scspamcop] Re: OT Re: Any hint about "pingeries"?   Eönwë
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   Eönwë
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   Eönwë
• [Scspamcop] Re: Niger [was: Attn: Deputies (Reporting error)]   Ant
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Ant
• [Scspamcop] Re: Spammer trick to avoid reporting   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing for Spamcop accounts   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing for Spamcop accounts   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?-Fixed   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: [media] Spamming ISP cut off from Internet   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: SenderBase SBRS discussions   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: SenderBase SBRS discussions   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   Robert Blair
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Robert Blair
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   Robert Blair
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Robert Blair
• [Scspamcop] [media] Spamming ISP cut off from Internet   Stephen Bye
• [Scspamcop] "substancedirect" nightmare   Claudio Valderrama C.
• [Scspamcop] Re: I apologize   Q Correll
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Q Correll
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Q Correll
• [Scspamcop] Re: [OT] Does anyone have an email address for reporting eBay spam?   Dar
• [Scspamcop] Re: Truth in Advertising   David
• [Scspamcop] Re: Hooray: Cyrillic filtering   Michael R N Dolbear
• [Scspamcop] Re: OT Re: Any hint about "pingeries"?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: comments to abuse addresses   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: What to adjust / can I adjust spams like these to get them to parse?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry: Spammer Walks Free as Virginia Anti-Spam Law Is Declared Unconstitutional   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Link obfuscation error   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Link obfuscation error   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Also note this (Was: Link obfuscation error)   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Attn: Deputies (Reporting error)   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: PS Re: Strange spams   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Attn: Deputies (Reporting error)   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] SenderBase SBRS discussions   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: SenderBase SBRS discussions   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: babelfish translator for Turkish?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is the spammer trying for the most reports in one spam or something?   Mike Easter
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   Anthony Edwards
• [Scspamcop] Greylisting does not work for me   Ejo
• [Scspamcop] Re: Greylisting does not work for me   Ejo
• [Scspamcop] Re: Old news   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Attn: Deputies (Reporting error)   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: DEPUTIES PLEASE? Mailhost still a failure for me with Verizon   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: "substancedirect" nightmare   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?-Fixed   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: question about SenderScoreCertified reports   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: question about SenderScoreCertified reports   Ellen
• [Scspamcop] Re: Mailhost setup   Farelf
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Farelf
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Farelf
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Farelf
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Farelf
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Farelf
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Farelf
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: Truth in Advertising [SPOILER]   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: [media] Spamming ISP cut off from Internet   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Is the spammer trying for the most reports in one spam or something?   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: Is the spammer trying for the most reports in one spam or something?   Geoffrey Hyde
• [Scspamcop] Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Maria Jacobs
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing for Spamcop accounts   Antispam Knight
• [Scspamcop] Attn: Deputies (Reporting error)   Antispam Knight
• [Scspamcop] Re: Attn: Deputies (Reporting error)   Antispam Knight
• [Scspamcop] Re: "substancedirect" nightmare   Antispam Knight
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   LKing
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   LKing
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   LKing
• [Scspamcop] Re: [OT] Does anyone have an email address for reporting eBay spam?   LKing
• [Scspamcop] Re: [OT] Does anyone have an email address for reporting eBay spam?   LKing
• [Scspamcop] Re: ATTN Deputies, SC Broken?   LKing
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   LKing
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry: Spammer Walks Free as Virginia Anti-Spam Law Is Declared Unconstitutional   D.F. Manno
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Maria
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Maria
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Maria
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Maria
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Maria
• [Scspamcop] I apologize   John Marion
• [Scspamcop] Re: malformed reply?   Tim McGraw
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing for Spamcop accounts   Tim McGraw
• [Scspamcop] Re: FU: Re: Sorry: Spammer Walks Free as Virginia Anti-Spam Law Is Declared Unconstitutional   Tim McGraw
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Tim McGraw
• [Scspamcop] Re: [media] Spamming ISP cut off from Internet   Tim McGraw
• [Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams   N. Miller
• [Scspamcop] Sorry: Spammer Walks Free as Virginia Anti-Spam Law Is Declared Unconstitutional   Neil
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing for Spamcop accounts   Opinicus
• [Scspamcop] Re: babelfish translator for Turkish?   Opinicus
• [Scspamcop] Phishing for Spamcop accounts   Peter Pearson
• [Scspamcop] Hooray: Cyrillic filtering   Peter Pearson
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Frog Prince
• [Scspamcop] comments to abuse addresses   RandallW
• [Scspamcop] parser webpage burping?   RandallW
• [Scspamcop] Re: parser webpage burping?   RandallW
• [Scspamcop] Re: [media] Spamming ISP cut off from Internet   RandallW
• [Scspamcop] babelfish translator for Turkish?   RandallW
• [Scspamcop] Re: What to adjust / can I adjust spams like these to get them to parse?   Skiwi
• [Scspamcop] Re: What to adjust / can I adjust spams like these to get them to parse?   Skiwi
• [Scspamcop] Re: What to adjust / can I adjust spams like these to get them to parse?   Skiwi
• [Scspamcop] Re: What to adjust / can I adjust spams like these to get them to parse?   Skiwi
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing for Spamcop accounts   Ian Smith
• [Scspamcop] Link obfuscation error   Ian Smith
• [Scspamcop] Re: Link obfuscation error   Ian Smith
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Snowbat
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Snowbat
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Snowbat
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Snowbat
• [Scspamcop] Re: Again - truncated reporting address   Snowbat
• [Scspamcop] Limits in the "mailhosts" panel?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Limits in the "mailhosts" panel?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Spammer trick to avoid reporting   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Spammer trick to avoid reporting   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing for Spamcop accounts   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Old news   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Link obfuscation error   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Also note this (Was: Link obfuscation error)   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Old news   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Also note this (Was: Link obfuscation error)   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Also note this (Was: Link obfuscation error)   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] And this - if you like (Was: Link obfuscation error)   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Giampaolo Tomassoni
• [Scspamcop] Re: OT Re: Any hint about "pingeries"?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Strange spams   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] PS Re: Strange spams   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Mailhost setup   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Mailhost setup   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] DEPUTIES PLEASE? Mailhost still a failure for me with Verizon   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] RESOLVED I think Re: DEPUTIES PLEASE? Mailhost still a failure for me with Verizon   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Truth in Advertising   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: a result of "by 0" ? & RFC?   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: for Mike & Ellen: Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   Twayne
• [Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] Re: email address change   Steven Underwood
• [Scspamcop] Re: Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Steven P. Underwood
• [Scspamcop] Re: [media] Spamming ISP cut off from Internet   VanguardLH
• [Scspamcop] Re: colocentral.com   Wazoo
• [Scspamcop] Re: What to adjust / can I adjust spams like these to get them to parse?   Wazoo
• [Scspamcop] Banned Forum Account - Was: Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address   Wazoo
• [Scspamcop] [OT] Does anyone have an email address for reporting eBay spam?   Will Wilkinson
• [Scspamcop] Re: [OT] Does anyone have an email address for reporting eBay spam?   Will Wilkinson
• [Scspamcop] Re: [OT] Does anyone have an email address for reporting eBay spam?   Will Wilkinson
• [Scspamcop] Re: Greylisting does not work for me   bar0
• [Scspamcop] Re: Greylisting does not work for me   bar0
• [Scspamcop] question about SenderScoreCertified reports   geekyguy
• [Scspamcop] Re: question about SenderScoreCertified reports   geekyguy
• [Scspamcop] Re: question about SenderScoreCertified reports   geekyguy
• [Scspamcop] malformed reply?   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: malformed reply?   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   jg
• [Scspamcop] Re: Truth in Advertising   jg
• [Scspamcop] email address change   mikeyhsd
• [Scspamcop] Re: email address change   mikeyhsd
• [Scspamcop] Re: Phishing for Spamcop accounts   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Re: Sorry: Spammer Walks Free as Virginia Anti-Spam Law Is Declared Unconstitutional   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Whose URL is Named?   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   rooster
• [Scspamcop] FU: Re: Sorry: Spammer Walks Free as Virginia Anti-Spam Law Is Declared Unconstitutional   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Truth in Advertising   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Re: Whose URL is Named?   rooster
• [Scspamcop] Re: RESOLVED? Re: Twayne summary   vg4cysss7001

Last message date: Tue Sep 30 19:04:59 EDT 2008
Archived on: Tue Sep 30 19:10:02 EDT 2008

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...