[Scspamcop] Re: Strange spams

[Twayne]

> "Twayne" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:garh3o$kal$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>> Well, I've always figured I'd throw out spamcop when they indicated
>> they would eventually insist on the mailhost only situation a long
>> time ago. Up until a couple of weeks ago it was never a problem,
>> either, so something has changed at spamcop, IMO.  I've been with SC
>> since almost day one and this "by 0" crap has been there just as
>> long.
>
> Twayne:  Have you ever contacted the deputies while tying to get your
> mailhost setup?  They can manually over-ride things that you can not
> do yourself... then you would have a working mailhost and no
> misreporting.  I believe the rejection reply actually provides the
> directions for getting this accomplished.  I know I needed to have it
> done for my work accounts for 2 different jobs because both used
> Postini which adds a header without me having control over it.

Mmm, not recently.  Actually, it was Don that originally pointed out the 
"by 0" part of the early received line that was causing the problem. 
I've made kind of a mental note to contact admin though after I try the 
mailhost setpup one more time, just to prove due diligence or whatever 
you want to call it.  At that time there was nothign SC could do for it. 
But things do change; sometimes.

Thanks for the comeback

Twayne