[Scspamcop] Re: "ISP resolved this issue sometime after Fri Nov 14 07:45:35 2008 -0800"

[Wazoo]

"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message 
news:gfl0bu$nic$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>
> ... any provider who doesn't want to be notified about something 
> or other
> 'speaks up' and then the dominant mode becomes to not notify, and 
> the SC
> reporter's feelings about notifying become considerably less 
> important
> than unwanted notifying.
>
> I say dominant because SC plays a little game with its reporters 
> about
> allowing paying reporters to 'appeal' to SC about notifying and 
> then not
> allowing appeals anymore and blah blah blah.
>
> Insinuate into that model the mechanism by which a notified is 
> able to
> communicate with SC about not wanting to be notified.
>
> I've never been a provider, so I haven't seen all of the 
> interfaces
> between SC and providers, but my concept of some of the interfaces 
> are
> oversimplified by the concepts:
>
> - I never want to be notified about anything, no way, no how
> - I do want to be notified about /some/ things, but I don't want 
> to be
> notified about a lot of other things.
> - I don't want to go on record as not wanting to be notified about
> anything, so I will simply respond in some way that lets you know 
> that I
> don't want to be notified about /this/ thing any more

I've tried to fill-in-the-blanks at;  ISP Abuse Report Center
http://forum.spamcop.net/scwik/ISPAbuseReportCenter