[Scspamcop] Re: "ISP resolved this issue sometime after Fri Nov 14
07:45:35 2008 -0800"
Mike Easter
MikeE at ster.invalid
Fri Nov 14 20:17:52 EST 2008
Twayne wrote:
> lol, I'm sure it is! The short version, I mean. But I agree with your
> thoughts for the most part. Good response, actually.
I think you meant to/ should have/ cite(d) me, who made the statement
above, and I think you (meant to/ should have) trimmed everything else
which you weren't specifically replying to, eg your post would/should look
like this....
<simulateTwayne>
Mike Easter wrote:
> That may seem to be a long-winded version of what I think, but it is
> actually the short version.
lol, I'm sure it is! The short version, I mean. But I agree with your
thoughts for the most part. Good response, actually.
</simulate>
... instead of not attributing me, and/but instead then bottom posting on
/all/ of my long reply instead of trimming everything but the last
sentence/par.
--
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin
More information about the SCspamcop
mailing list