[Scspamcop] Re: "ISP resolved this issue sometime after Fri Nov 14 07:45:35 2008 -0800"

Mike Easter MikeE at ster.invalid
Fri Nov 14 20:17:52 EST 2008


Twayne wrote:

> lol, I'm sure it is!  The short version, I mean.  But I agree with your
> thoughts for the most part.  Good response, actually.

I think you meant to/ should have/ cite(d) me, who made the statement
above, and I think you (meant to/ should have) trimmed everything else
which you weren't specifically replying to, eg your post would/should look
like this....


<simulateTwayne>
Mike Easter wrote:
> That may seem to be a long-winded version of what I think, but it is
> actually the short version.

lol, I'm sure it is!  The short version, I mean.  But I agree with your
thoughts for the most part.  Good response, actually.
</simulate>


... instead of not attributing me, and/but instead then bottom posting on
/all/ of my long reply instead of trimming everything but the last
sentence/par.


-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin



More information about the SCspamcop mailing list