[Scspamcop] Re: "ISP resolved this issue sometime after Fri Nov 14 07:45:35 2008 -0800"

[Mike Easter]

Mike Easter wrote:

> I say dominant because SC plays a little game with its reporters about
> allowing paying reporters to 'appeal' to SC about notifying and then not
> allowing appeals anymore and blah blah blah.

In case those remarks may be confusing or vague to those with free
accounts, here are some explanatory links.

http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/288.html  A premium account gives
you access to more features on SpamCop than free users. These features
include: -- The option to appeal a website/URL issue in parsed spam that
you find has been incorrectly reported as 'closed' or an 'innocent
bystander';

http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/262.html  paying members are
allowed to appeal. -When you parse a message and see that "ISP has taken
action" or "ISP does not wish to receive reports", you will almost always
be presented with a checkbox to appeal.

Naturally if something has (already) been appealed, then the appealing (to
please notify anyway) is over.


-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin