[Scspamcop] Re: Spam will cease

[Bar0]

"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message 
news:g5qdv9$bhd$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> Ellen wrote:
>> Robert Blair wrote:
>>> "Giampaolo Tomassoni"
... and so forth....
>
> It would seem that the parser 'configuration' should show a devnull
> address for the report addressee than no opportunity for the reporter to
> send/report the devnull.

One of the flaws here is that pasting such a spam into the form, or mailing 
it, and parsing, would cause statistical hits against the source in this 
case even if the user only intends to check and cancel a parse. I agree with 
Mike, these should go to (or appear to) a /dev/null. allowing the user to 
decide whether a parse should be counted, ie chose a cancel or "submit"

I tend to suspect that in some cases, and Fanbridge is one of them, spam 
will cease, means that the spam run will probably finish by... (whenever).