[Scspamcop] Re: Faux addresses:

[Ant]

"Twayne" wrote:

>> Twayne wrote:
>
> Don't take offense at any of this; I'm simply a more direct person than
> most are.  I mean no disrespect to  any dummies, err, I mean, you [:^).

Talking to yourself? Your attributions are shot.

> BTW, It's no longer nobody at spamcop.net last I
> knew, but I'll recheck on that one later.  I think devnull is still in
> the latest suggestion.

Quote from Ellen earlier in the thread:
"Feel free to use  nobody at spamcop.net ... it delivers directly to
 devnull".

>> ster.invalid
>>
>> That is no resource usage.
>
> By your own reasoning, that's today; how about tomorrow?

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt
RFC 2606  Reserved Top Level DNS Names

<quote>
There is a need for top level domain (TLD) names that can be used for
creating names which, without fear of conflicts with current or
future actual TLD names in the global DNS...

".invalid" is intended for use in online construction of domain names
that are sure to be invalid and which it is obvious at a glance are
invalid.
</quote>