[Scspamcop] Re: Spam sent to a recent spamcop reporting address

[Sofa King Tyred of Lar Ting]

Wazoo wrote:
> "Sofa King Tyred of Lar Ting" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in 
> message news:ft5auj$oc9$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>> In the future, is it best to let SC send the reports to SC admin? 
>> The admin should see it's a question of a spam (not a legit 
>> response to a reporting address), and probably track down the 
>> "leaky" address that received the report with that ID.
> 
> My opinion, no way should one allow a "bad reporting" parse result 
> go to Don/Admin.  At the least, that would represent that one is not 
> paying any attention to the Parse results and targets offered.

Hello? I don't think you're understanding still. I don't see this as a 
bad reporting parse. It's a spammer who is spamming me through an SC 
address. It's not my mistake to report it. Spammers who get these 
addresses likely got them from reports they somehow got their hands on 
(a so-called "leaky" reportee), or by "guessing" the reporting address.

> At 
> the best, one would be adding to the work-load of one person that 
> already has his hands full with trying to stay on top of so many 
> other things. 

Yabbut - Don/Admin seems to be the guy who can disable a "leaky" 
reportee. Ellen pointed out he already disabled it, so I wouldn't be 
surprised if other reporting addresses got used in spams from that same 
leaky reportee.