[Scspamcop] Re: Spam sent to a recent spamcop reporting address
Wazoo
nobody at devnull.spamcop.net
Fri Apr 4 12:46:10 EDT 2008
"Sofa King Tyred of Lar Ting" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in
message news:ft5auj$oc9$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> Wazoo wrote:
>> "Sofa King Tyred of Lar Ting" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote
>> in message news:ft2l4u$3a2$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>>> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1767967977zfe1fb38ca3f70fdac10beaa29da6bc15z
>>>
>>> It's an item showing a spam that was sent to a recent reporting
>>> address, and thus arrived in my inbox.
>>>
>>> Is it a fluke? Did spammy get lucky? SC wanted to send new
>>> reports to the SpamCop admin (Don), but I canceled it.
>>
>> This situation is not unknown. The 'Report' would have gone to
>> Don for action to be taken against the SpamCop.net user due to
>> "bad reporting" ....
>
> Did you look at the spam item above? It is a *spam* that was sent
> to a reporting address. The real name in quotes next to the
> address is not the one I use as my friendly name on SC.
>
> It implies that somehow the spammer got a reporting address,
> possibly through a report that SC sends out. Given Ellen's
> response, it appears that Don already knew about this problem.
???? I posted to point out links that answered your conjectured
query about the link between a Report-ID and a Reporting Account.
> This is not addressed in any FAQs that I could see.
Technically. not a FAQ issue, although there are many instances of
the situation in previous newsgroup and Forum traffic. As I stated,
this scenario is not unknown. Now if you have a suggestion for
something like a Wiki page that might address something like this,
how about starting with something as easy as a page name, such that
the next person impacted would actually find that page ...????
> In the future, is it best to let SC send the reports to SC admin?
> The admin should see it's a question of a spam (not a legit
> response to a reporting address), and probably track down the
> "leaky" address that received the report with that ID.
My opinion, no way should one allow a "bad reporting" parse result
go to Don/Admin. At the least, that would represent that one is not
paying any attention to the Parse results and targets offered. At
the best, one would be adding to the work-load of one person that
already has his hands full with trying to stay on top of so many
other things.
More information about the SCspamcop
mailing list