[Scspamcop] Re: Internationalize SC reports - a little bit...?

[WazoO]

"Patto" <nobody at devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:f19mao$j59$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> WazoO wrote:
> > ...
> > As stated above, it's not like the e-mail just sits there waiting to
> > be tossed out 'directly' .... it's actually grabbed, stored, manuplated,
> > handled, processed, etc. by a number of tools, not all of which can or
> > are configured to handle every character-set under the sun ....
>
> Thanks for your reply and explanation. I don't know in what code SC is
> written. Most modern languages have string-handling functions that allow
> multi-byte strings, and those would (normally) handle "every
> character-set under the sun". This is an effort that would need to be
> done once; replace the single-byte capable string functions with
> multi-byte capable ones. And then there is of course the encoding of the
> outgoing report that needs to be the same as the incoming spam message.

Invitation made to take a look at;
http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?autocom=bugtracker&code=show_bug&bug_title_id=4985
with the understanding that this 'new' Topic was opened up because the
'original' Topic grew too scattered, confusing, broad, whatever ..
http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?autocom=bugtracker&code=show_bug&bug_title_id=4833

Although I don't recall JP being in the mix, there were a lot of other
languages brought into the discussion .... and character-sets themselves
stayed right up there kicking ...