[Scspamcop] Re: So can anyone tell me why SpamCop doesn't chaintest
this item, or even recognize the second line as valid?
Geoffrey Hyde
g.hyde at bigNOSPAMpond.net.au
Sat Aug 4 19:53:25 EDT 2007
"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:f92msf$vk5$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> Tim McGraw wrote:
>> Mike Easter wrote:
>>>
>>> PKB stands for Pot, Kettle, Black
>>
>> And not to be confused with PEBKAC.
>
> problem exists between keyboard & chair
>
> pebkac is a much nicer term than 'ibk' - idiot behind keyboard.
Is there an acronym yet for something that essentially means "user has seen
way too many spams in his lifetime to ever be fooled by them"? I'm sure the
internet would invent one, eventually.
The reason I asked about the original spamitem is because mailservers still
don't stamp completely complaint Received: lines, even today. And it
bothers me that I *might* miss something that was a spam tactic a lot more
than 200 that weren't a spam tactic.
Cheers ...
Geoffrey Hyde
More information about the SCspamcop
mailing list