[Scspamcop] Re: So can anyone tell me why SpamCop doesn't chaintest this item, or even recognize the second line as valid?

[Chris Wright]

Joe Gill wrote:
> "Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:f92369$e1v$1 at news.spamcop.net...
>> Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
>> Subject: So can anyone tell me why SpamCop doesn't chaintest this item,
>> or even recognize the second line as valid?
>>
>> I know you probably think I 'pick on you' about these things, but that
>> isn't a good subject.  That question should be down in the body of your
>> message.  Your subject should be short/brief and encapsulate or entitle
>> the message/question's meaning in just a few words, maybe 'Mailhost
>> chaining problem?'
>>
> 
> Was that REALLY necessary???
> We are not people that need 'lessons'....

Erm... when someone usually includes the words "tell me why" and leaves 
a question mark at the end of a sentence, that usually indicates the 
presence of a question.  In order to 'answer' that question, the 
responder must present facts in response to said question.
Therefore, one could consider the response to be classed as a lesson...

So if you don't want teaching, don't ask questions...

;)

That's my fill of AR behaviour today...I promise not to do it again... 
(AR ... last word retentive, first word bum)

> He expressed himself in the way he saw fit and conveyed information the way 
> he chose...

Mike just educated him about not putting questions in the subject of the 
email and suggested moving them to the body...

> Lectures are not needed, nor are lessons!

Tell that to the uneducated... and don't let my kids hear you say that...