[Scspamcop] Re: low importance - anyone know what this spammer is peddling?

[Pop]

jg wrote:
> On 8/3/2007 5:17 PM Blinky the Shark inquired:
>
>> ed wrote:
>>
>>> This is a very-well-paid vacation for serious energetic people.
>>
>> Nice misspelling of vocation, there.  Makes it sound good.  :)
>>
>>
> no, spammer meant vacation.
>
> There is a set of spammer rules and there should be a set of spam
> reader rules as well.
> Anyone dumb enough to think that manna falls off the branches of the
> internet tree will respond to offers of paid vacations.  Most of this
> ilk don't know what vocation means...

Ignorance and inexperience is not a crime, nor is it shameful.  Neither is 
being "dumb" about something.
   If you're hungry enough, cold enough, undressed enough, poor enough, 
streetwise, etc. etc. etc., even you could find in your desparation that 
some of those offers could be very enticing.

It's easy to be disparaging; it's harder to be sensible.

Pop`