[Scspamcop] Re: So can anyone tell me why SpamCop doesn't chaintest this item, or even recognize the second line as valid?

[ed]

On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:18:40 +1000
"Geoffrey Hyde" <g.hyde at bigNOSPAMpond.net.au> wrote:

> What's wrong with that second Received: line that makes SpamCop not
> even want to consider it?
> 
> Is it something wrong with mailhosted account versus non-mailhosted
> account? Doess SpamCop have a programming error of some kind?

I'm no expert with SC, but why is the MTA using the IP address
then .in-addr.arpa, for a PTR one should reverse the ip blocks, so I
would have thought 209.52.112.78.in-addr.arpa would be the correct
notation for your reverse IP.

-- 
The T3 to the fax machine is dying a slow death because of the monkey
done broke it. Valve Software is having a LAN party.
:: http://www.s5h.net/ :: http://www.s5h.net/gpg