[Scspamcop] Re: low importance - anyone know what this spammer is peddling?

[jg]

On 8/3/2007 5:17 PM Blinky the Shark inquired:

> ed wrote:
> 
>> This is a very-well-paid vacation for serious energetic people.
> 
> Nice misspelling of vocation, there.  Makes it sound good.  :)
> 
>   
no, spammer meant vacation.

There is a set of spammer rules and there should be a set of spam reader
rules as well.
Anyone dumb enough to think that manna falls off the branches of the
internet tree will respond to offers of paid vacations.  Most of this
ilk don't know what vocation means...