[Scspamcop] Re: SpamCop don't detect imageshack.us

[Andrew Engels Rump (formerly Leif Andrew Rump)]

I demand that Tim McGraw <tmcgraw at spamcop.net> may or may not have
written in news:euru8k$aae$1 at news.spamcop.net: 
> Andrew Engels Rump wrote:
>> Hmm. graphic links to me is something enclosed in <img src="...">.
>> I see you point but I don't agree because I think the spammers has
>> found a new way to avoid reporting of spam sites.
> Too often graphics links are innocent bystanders.

Agree but they have IMHO to be inclosed in <img src="..."> to be of
any use for the spammer, i.e., to give the spam a tasty look :-)
An URL to an image which the receiver has to follow don't give the
spammer value unless the image is the spam, i.e., it should be
reportable - I don't care if the checkboxes are default off.

Andrew Engels Rump
-- 
Software Engineer
E-mail: mailto:newandrew at rump.dk
WWW: http://www.rump.dk/homepage/andrew/