[Scspamcop] Re: SpamCop don't detect imageshack.us

[Chris Wright]

Mike Easter wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
>> "Mike Easter"
> 
>>> SC doesn't report anything about body links to graphics
>>> http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1222/webwq0.gif
> 
>> Hmm. graphic links to me is something enclosed in <img src="...">.
>> I see you point but I don't agree because I think the spammers has
>> found a new way to avoid reporting of spam sites.
> 
> imageshack.us and similars are image hosting sites, not 'actual'
> payloads.
> 
> Reporting to imageshack is probably/ might be/ useful.  Free reporters
> can do it manually, paid reporters can do it as an additional notified.
> I tried to look at their TOS and report abuse pages, but the site was
> too slow to wait for.
> 
I had 6 of these come in this morning and reported them via a link on 
their main page (report abuse or something).
I got some automated response on all 6..
One was taken down later on (although I doubt by my report alone).

I gave up on the next 200+ that came in... (spread over 20 domains).
Looks like Mr Spammy has decided imageshack to be their host of choice 
for a wee while.