[Scspamcop] Re: SpamCop don't detect imageshack.us

Tim McGraw tmcgraw at spamcop.net
Mon Apr 2 17:57:40 EDT 2007


Andrew Engels Rump wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>> SC doesn't report anything about body links to graphics
>> http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1222/webwq0.gif
>> SC sez in your tracker links:
>> Finding links in message body
>> Parsing text part
>> no links found
>> That's because there were no 'legitimate' links/urls only graphic links.
> Hmm. graphic links to me is something enclosed in <img src="...">.
> I see you point but I don't agree because I think the spammers has found a
> new way to avoid reporting of spam sites.

Too often graphics links are innocent bystanders.


More information about the SCspamcop mailing list