[Scspamcop] Re: SpamCop don't detect imageshack.us

[Andrew Engels Rump (formerly Leif Andrew Rump)]

I demand that "Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> may or may not have 
written in news:eurs0o$8dj$1 at news.spamcop.net:
> Andrew wrote:
>> "Mike Easter"
>>> SC doesn't report anything about body links to graphics
>>> http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1222/webwq0.gif
>> Hmm. graphic links to me is something enclosed in <img src="...">.
>> I see you point but I don't agree because I think the spammers has
>> found a new way to avoid reporting of spam sites.
> imageshack.us and similars are image hosting sites, not 'actual'
> payloads.
> Reporting to imageshack is probably/ might be/ useful.  Free reporters
> can do it manually, paid reporters can do it as an additional notified.
> I tried to look at their TOS and report abuse pages, but the site was
> too slow to wait for.

Yep, but I have to look up the abuse addresses "manually" - I know it
is easy but it requires a few more keystrokes compared to the normal
SpamCop few button clicks.

Andrew Engels Rump
-- 
Software Engineer
E-mail: mailto:newandrew at rump.dk
WWW: http://www.rump.dk/homepage/andrew/