[Scspamcop] Re: SpamCop don't detect imageshack.us

[Andrew Engels Rump (formerly Leif Andrew Rump)]

I demand that "Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> may or may not have 
written in news:eurl64$vso$1 at news.spamcop.net:
> Andrew Engels Rump (formerly Leif Andrew Rump) wrote:
>> I've posted the first spam in spamcop.spam with the same topic as this
>> posting (Xns9906D3AF25445newandrewrumpdk at 216.154.195.61). It seems
>> like SpamCop ignores imageshack.us in all of them!?! What gives?
> SC doesn't report anything about body links to graphics
> http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1222/webwq0.gif
> SC sez in your tracker links:
> Finding links in message body
> Parsing text part
> no links found
> That's because there were no 'legitimate' links/urls only graphic links.

Hmm. graphic links to me is something enclosed in <img src="...">.
I see you point but I don't agree because I think the spammers has found a
new way to avoid reporting of spam sites.

Andrew Engels Rump
-- 
Software Engineer
E-mail: mailto:newandrew at rump.dk
WWW: http://www.rump.dk/homepage/andrew/