[Scspamcop] Re: Network Solutions turned off my domain

[V Meyers]

"Mike Easter" <MikeE at ster.invalid> wrote in message
news:eurdu5$n47$1 at news.spamcop.net...
> V Meyers wrote:
> > Hello, again. On item 3 below. Do you have a more complete header or
> > a link to a specific item like this?
> > Or I might just be looking in the wrong places...
>
> You are not posting correctly to a newsgroup.  When you post a reply, do
> *not* just hit reply and start typing.  That is called 'top posting' and
> it fails to perform 3 very important and essential functions.  It fails
> to properly attribute, or to properly trim, or to properly contextualize
> your remarks.

Sorry about that, one 3 line top post negates my other 20 or so proper
messages that are not top-posted and I am a newbie now? :-)

> This process is described for new newsgroup readers here
> http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/nquote.html  Quoting Style in
> Newsgroup Postings -- Q2: How should I use the quoted text and arrange
> it with my own text? -- Q3: Why shouldn't I quote the entire posting
> that I'm responding to?
>
> You should study that faq and post news message replies in that fashion.
> It greatly enchances the quality of communication, and it prevents your
> posts from 'messing up' the order of a conversation, and it prevents
> future following posters from having to restructure your posts for you.
>
> If I attribute, trim, and contextualize for you, it starts to look like
> this.
>
>
> V Meyers wrote:
> > "Ellen"
>
> >> I can tell you the following:
>
> >> 3) there were/are however a large number of reports for
> >> 205.178.132.70 due to a script exploit on that shared server. That
> >> IP and server have a connection to netsol it appears. Here is part
> >> of the received header showing the spam being sent from this IP:
>
> > On item 3 below. Do you have a more complete header or
> > a link to a specific item like this?
>
>
> ... except that now item 3 is above, not below your remarks.
>
> Ellen is a spamcop deputy.  She has access to the evidence in the
> spamcop report files, including reporter reports and spamtrap reports.
>
> She has access to items which are not published or publicly accessible.
> What you should do is take her word for it, but what you don't have is
> her same access to carry on your battle with NetSol.
>

I did take her word for it.  I was just looking for something that is
published or publicly available that would have more specific information
such as 'was my domain name on it or not?' or a resource to look at that I
may not have known about. Such as an archive of some sort, since the address
comes up clean now.  So I asked.

>>>Which script is insecure and is allowing the spammer to send spam is
>>>something that only the admin of the server is able to determine.

I submitted a request to Cox to look at or send me logs to check on this...
they did not want to bothered with it.

>
> -- 
> Mike Easter
> kibitzer, not SC admin
>