[Scrouting] Re: Even if it could handle multibyte characters, SC doesn't find reporting address

[Tim McGraw]

Mike Easter wrote:
> Tim McGraw wrote:
>> I don't know how long it took before sc would use the '-B' flag to
>> disable email filters on ripe.net. The last time I pointed it out in
>> .routing was 9/17/07 re: 77.77.0.249. Today, sc knows the stated abuse
>> address for that IP# at ripe.net is ultranet at abv.bg but insists on
>> sending reports to five other addresses that it gets from abuse.net for
>> abv.bg.
> That algo is by design.  SC gets the contact addy from ripe (successfully,
> no filter) and ('intentionally') uses abuse.net on the domainname.

If the netblock owner sez reports for that netblock should go to a 
particular address, why would sc send it anywhere else?

> ... 'you'/one can get the
> 
> abuse-mailbox:  ultranet at abv.bg
> nic-hdl:        IT711-RIPE
> 
> ... with or without the -B flag.

Well, that's new since I last checked.

If one is using the ripe.net Web site and clicks on "Advanced Search" 
(http://www.ripe.net/whois?form_type=simple&full_query_string=&searchtext=&Advanced+Search+Form=Advanced+Search+Form) 
and then click on "Disable e-mail filtering" it goes to 
(http://www.db.ripe.net/db/whois/whoishelp.html#filter_mail) which has 
no reference to -B.