[Scrouting] Re: DTI-NET 218.225.224.0/19

[Mike Easter]

Sam Trappe wrote:

> 3. The .routing newsgroup is cluttered by responses from some (well,
> one, really), who has no ability to make changes, but muddies the
> water sufficiently (such as in his not helpful reply to your question)
> that the overworked .routing staff/volunteers overlook your question.

I disagree with that one.

 -1- .routing isn't 'cluttered' with responses by me; 7 in 60 posts
 -2- whatever responses I make don't interfere with whatever the routing
deputy wants to do with/about someone's post here

I think it would be great if someone could learn/adopt the spamcop routing
philosophy and then would be able to contribute positively to routing in a
way that makes the powers-that-be happy.  To me, that seems like a
difficult dynamic.


--
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin