From me at privacy.net Wed Sep 10 16:28:11 2008 From: me at privacy.net (Will Wilkinson) Date: Wed Sep 10 16:30:02 2008 Subject: [Scmail] Webmail down Message-ID: SpamCop webmail appears to be down as of 21:25 BST, POP3 access is still working OK. Tried from 2 separate access routes (BT & Nildram) and both giving network timeouts. Will -- e-mail news dot will at lancre dot net '98 300Tdi Defender 110 CSW, 1/12th NB Sometimes PGP Fingerprint E089 1736 A023 9E5C AFA3 0B40 E5DC D80A 9E1F D521 Public key can be obtained from ldap://certserver.pgp.com From me at privacy.net Wed Sep 10 17:01:59 2008 From: me at privacy.net (Will Wilkinson) Date: Wed Sep 10 17:05:04 2008 Subject: [Scmail] Re: Webmail down References: Message-ID: In message , Will Wilkinson writes >SpamCop webmail appears to be down as of 21:25 BST, POP3 access is >still working OK. Tried from 2 separate access routes (BT & Nildram) >and both giving network timeouts. > >Will Back up now at 22:00 BST. Will -- e-mail news dot will at lancre dot net '98 300Tdi Defender 110 CSW, 1/12th NB Sometimes PGP Fingerprint E089 1736 A023 9E5C AFA3 0B40 E5DC D80A 9E1F D521 Public key can be obtained from ldap://certserver.pgp.com From tmcgraw at spamcop.net Wed Sep 10 20:58:20 2008 From: tmcgraw at spamcop.net (Tim McGraw) Date: Wed Sep 10 21:00:02 2008 Subject: [Scmail] Re: Webmail down In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Will Wilkinson wrote: > Back up now at 22:00 BST. I can ping it but I can't login due to timeout. From me at privacy.net Wed Sep 10 21:28:23 2008 From: me at privacy.net (Will Wilkinson) Date: Wed Sep 10 21:30:03 2008 Subject: [Scmail] Re: Webmail down References: Message-ID: In message , Tim McGraw writes >Will Wilkinson wrote: >> Back up now at 22:00 BST. > >I can ping it but I can't login due to timeout. OK here at the moment (02:30 BST) - I wonder if there's some intermittent problem, possibly routing related (seen that before some time ago). Will -- e-mail news dot will at lancre dot net '98 300Tdi Defender 110 CSW, 1/12th NB Sometimes PGP Fingerprint E089 1736 A023 9E5C AFA3 0B40 E5DC D80A 9E1F D521 Public key can be obtained from ldap://certserver.pgp.com From me at privacy.net Sat Sep 13 05:31:48 2008 From: me at privacy.net (Michael R N Dolbear) Date: Sat Sep 13 05:35:04 2008 Subject: [Scmail] Spamcop mail - change for some POP and IMAP users Message-ID: <01c91583$89a104e0$40d6403e@default> The following will explain some recent failures to validate. 12Sept/08 [16:36 EDT] We have phased out support for using a percent (%) sign instead of an at sign (@) for login usernames. If you have been using the 'username%spamcop.net' format for logging in to POP or IMAP, please switch to 'username@spamcop.net' or you will have problems connecting. same for username@cqmail.net If you have an old email client that rejects the change, too bad. First rejects were encountered 48 hours before this notice. Down with ex post facto ! -- Mike D From ppearson at nowhere.invalid Sun Sep 14 20:59:11 2008 From: ppearson at nowhere.invalid (Peter Pearson) Date: Sun Sep 14 21:00:03 2008 Subject: [Scmail] Server certificate verification error Message-ID: Beginning September 10th, about one time in four when fetchmail attempts to retrieve my email from pop.spamcop.net (POP3), it logs these three messages: Server certificate verification error: unable to get local issuer certificate Server certificate verification error: certificate not trusted Server certificate verification error: unable to verify the first certificate Those look like SSL messages to me, but I'm not asking for SSL, as far as I can tell: my .fetchmailrc file doesn't contain "ssl". Does anybody have any idea why this is happening? -- To email me, substitute nowhere->spamcop, invalid->net.