[Scgeeks] Re: [Bug] headers parsing bug [extra Received: headers
found]
Andrzej Filip
anfi at onet.eu
Thu Dec 20 03:59:04 EST 2007
Mike Easter wrote:
> Mike Easter wrote:
>
>> If I remove all of the extra headers which have been added by various
>> servers since the beginning,
>
> ... I get this:
>
> http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1574679233zadbd4fdaad23d792463ae29103c59f0dz
>
> That shows the original spam with the 2 boguslines 'implicating'
> homeunix which is contained in the body of the misdirected bounce by the
> pnbon server. SC parses the misdirected bounce headers correctly.
>
> The XSApreview function shouldn't be putting so many lines in there;
> maybe the subject and a couple of lines of body. It should not be going
> into misdirected bounce headers when that is part of the body.
>
> The reason SC erred by trying to rearrange the whitespace of the XSA
> line which contained a standard Received traceline content which was
> 'mangled' in the opinion of the algo was because the algo is 'taught'
> how to handle many different kinds of suboptimal header submissions.
>
> You Andrzej are not going to be able to convince the algo coder to dumb
> down the algo so that it won't misparse your wild XSA preview lines when
> those lines are all junked up with header elements which don't belong up
> there in a header field value.
Look at the *original* submission:
http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z1574530141zb39c8a082e6c406ee01039820dfd8f34z;action=display
The problem is that spamcop "parsed" content of "X-SA-Preview:" -
the header should be simply skipped.
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi at priv.onet.pl : anfi at xl.wp.pl
More information about the SCgeeks
mailing list