[SpamCop-List] Re: Pop's Avenue A Experience Re: PINGING: Mike Easter Pls

[Mike Easter]

PopRivet wrote:
> All the info's over on .spam, same Subject line
> (without re:.. of course).

Also answered in .spam w/ fups to .help

> See some inlines:

Good!

> Mike Easter wrote:
>>> Spam Pop wrote:
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>    Sorry, I didn't make the connection to that
> assumption or
> ..
>>> For the 4th or so time in recent posts, *no* - spamlinks is not my
>>> website.
> ===  Dunno what spamlinks is/was.  This is a geocities
> site.  See .spam for details.  Sorry if I reopened a
> can of worms.

Ideally there should be an empty line after 'website.' and then the ===
isn't really needed before 'Dunno' because it will be clear anyway.

The way I usually post the link is because the weblink 'builder' sez:

To link to this page use spamlinks.net/spamlinks.htm with the link
http://spamlinks.net/spamlinks.htm attached but depending on how you get
there, you may go to geocities
http://www.geocities.com/spamresources/spamlinks.htm or
http://spamlinks.port5.com/spamlinks.htm

>>> navigate to the saved .jpg or whatever it is and click it into being
>>> attached.
> ==  Done.  They're small jpegs, but still readable.
> Didn't want to waste a lot of bw.

Don't forget to make that empty line, it only uses 1 char of bw ;-)

>>> We're not talking about any website of mine here.
> ==  OK.  Guess that makes it all irrelevant then.  I'd
> have sworn I got there from a link  you provided, but
> ... mea culpa.

I provided the link, yes.  The only real relevance is that I would
encourage you to surf more securely so that a site like the geocities
one won't cause you trouble.  Oh, yeah, don't forget about the empty
line ;-)

>>> that topposting interferes with the ability of the topposter to read
>>> messages which are posted in reply to other
> messages.
> ==  I agree, in most cases.  I hadn 't intended an
> ongoing communication - figured you'd either say to
> send it or forget about it, in which case there wasn't
> any need to maintain a chronology of any kind.

You can never really predict when a dialogue will develop.  I always
'assume' it will.

> ANYthing related to that, in fact!  Sheesh, I wish I'da
> just ignored it now, and let whatever happens happen,
> and add that site to my never-land list.

I think it's a very good page.  See the alternate links above.

> and right this second I'd rather be out at the BBQ.

I'm having a beer myself, but I don't have any bbq.  Wish I did.

-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin