[SpamCop.net - protecting the internet through technology]

[SpamCop-List] Pop's Avenue A Experience Re: PINGING: Mike Easter Pls

PopRivet dilbert84 at hotmail.com
Sat May 1 16:28:13 EDT 2004


Hi Mike,
All the info's over on .spam, same Subject line
(without re:.. of course).  It's probably all on the
straight and narrow, but I guess it can't hurt you to
know about it.  Seems like you're sure it wasn't your
site, so it's not very relevant to anything anymore.
If it's not your, then my sincere apologies for the
hassle.

See some inlines:

Mike Easter wrote:
>> Spam Pop wrote:
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>    Sorry, I didn't make the connection to that
assumption or
..
>> For the 4th or so time in recent posts, *no* -
spamlinks is not my
>> website.
===  Dunno what spamlinks is/was.  This is a geocities
site.  See .spam for details.  Sorry if I reopened a
can of worms.
>>
...
>> If you will post here what website or link or url
you are talking
>> about, someone can take a look.
===  Done.  All the info I have is in .spam.
>>
...
>> Hell, we use and abuse the spamcop.spam newsgroup
for all kinds of
>> things.  Since this is a spamcop news related issue,
let's just take
>> a look at it attached to a message in .spam.  Start
a message in
>> .spam [not here], use your Insert menu/ File
attachment item/
>> navigate to the saved .jpg or whatever it is and
click it into being
>> attached.
==  Done.  They're small jpegs, but still readable.
Didn't want to waste a lot of bw.
>>
...
>> We're not talking about any website of mine here.
==  OK.  Guess that makes it all irrelevant then.  I'd
have sworn I got there from a link  you provided, but
... mea culpa.

>  I honestly believe
>> that topposting interferes with the ability of the
topposter to read
>> messages which are posted in reply to other
messages.
==  I agree, in most cases.  I hadn 't intended an
ongoing communication - figured you'd either say to
send it or forget about it, in which case there wasn't
any need to maintain a chronology of any kind.

> If you will
>> read and reply by trimming and contextualizing for
an inline
>> 'conversation' I'll bet you will be able to perceive
that spamlinks
>> isn't my website.
==  lol, I never said, and never meant to say, that it
was -you-!  I don't recall ever participating in
ANYthing related to that, in fact!  Sheesh, I wish I'da
just ignored it now, and let whatever happens happen,
and add that site to my never-land list.  I won't
bother to try giving anyone else here a headsup again,
you can count on that!  I don't mind flames, which I am
NOT accusing you of, but I do mind wasting my time -
and right this second I'd rather be out at the BBQ.

>>
>> --
>> Mike Easter
>> kibitzer, not SC admin

==  Pop




More information about the SpamCop-List mailing list