[SpamCop-List] Re: PINGING: Mike Easter Pls

[Mike Easter]

Spam Pop wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>    Sorry, I didn't make the connection to that assumption or
> I'd have worded it differently.
>    When I came across your website addess here on the board,
> I slipped over to view it briefly, came back and read some
> more on the SC groups, and then went back to your site.
>    You DID give your site URL here, right?

For the 4th or so time in recent posts, *no* - spamlinks is not my
website.

>    At any rate, when I got there, something really strange
> came up on the screen about AvenueA trying to be
> downloadeded, during the first page paint, so I grabbed a
> screenshot of it and held onto it to contact you about. I
> cannot state unequivicolly that it sourced from your site
> and not my own machine, but I am pretty much positive it
> wasn't me.

If you will post here what website or link or url you are talking about,
someone can take a look.

>     The screenshot doesn't clearly show your URL, but does
> show about the top 2/3s of it, as I didn't move the covering
> window far enough out of the way when I grabbed the
> screenshot,  and dropped you that message.
>    It's that screenshot I wanted to send you for your
> edification and for your comment.

Hell, we use and abuse the spamcop.spam newsgroup for all kinds of
things.  Since this is a spamcop news related issue, let's just take a
look at it attached to a message in .spam.  Start a message in .spam
[not here], use your Insert menu/ File attachment item/ navigate to the
saved .jpg or whatever it is and click it into being attached.

> At the time I was hoping
> to give you a heads up in  case you weren't aware of some
> nefarious goings on.  Still happy to share it, here or
> privately, whichever you wish.  I'm killing the Yahoo
> account though; I have to let it set the wrong kind of
> cookies to use it.

We're not talking about any website of mine here.  I honestly believe
that topposting interferes with the ability of the topposter to read
messages which are posted in reply to other messages.  If you will read
and reply by trimming and contextualizing for an inline 'conversation'
I'll bet you will be able to perceive that spamlinks isn't my website.

-- 
Mike Easter
kibitzer, not SC admin