[SpamCop-List] Re: The chinese own spam

[Marjolein Katsma]

Frog Prince (me at privacy.net) wrote in
news:c6v1k7$5ts$1 at news.spamcop.net: 

>| The Chinese government benefits from piracy and copyright
>| infringement? 
>|
>| Show me the proof.
> 
> I can't show you proof but I can relate from personal experience with
> product we developed that was to be made in mainland china.  The
> product (with the moldmakers initials) was on the shelf in the USA
> before the samples were delivered to for review/approval.  The contact
> and contract was arraigned with and through the Chinese government.

And _how_ does that benefit the Chinese government, as you claim?

Making and selling counterfeit goods benefits the manufacturer and the 
salesmen. (Much, if not most, is for theinternal market anyway.)

And many companies going to China (and elsewhere) to contract 
manufacturing are making up contracts that *deliberately* involve 
technology transfer. Written into the contract. Ultimately, it does 
benefit them, because they get get a body of schooled technicians and 
manufacturing facilities that can produce their goods more cheaply than 
they could at home.

> In return for support in Iraq the Chinese were given preferential
> treatment on imports of woven products.  The only stipulation was that
> the twine/string/tread be from US manufactures.  Chinese government
> sore that was the deal but when it developed that there was
> insufficient production much less export of US made yarn to support
> the amout imported it developed that the Chinese government was faking
> the certification. 

So you're saying the Chinese were being duped by the American 
government. How's that for "business culture"?


-- 
Marjolein Katsma - Amsterdam, NL - http://hshelp.com/
Spam reporting addresses: http://banspam.javawoman.com/report3.html

Spammers steal resources: they're my enemy.
Cyveillance steals resources: they're my enemy.
The enemy of my enemy can be my enemy, too.