From ric.gates at bigsleep.org Fri Apr 1 00:11:08 2005 From: ric.gates at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Thu Mar 31 19:15:05 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: XP registry fix for large number of files/directories References: Message-ID: On 31 Mar 2005 Joe Gill entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d2i0e0$ql4$1@news.spamcop.net: > When I open most XP directories, the files are no longer sorted.... > > IIRC, there is a registry 'tweak' that increases a 'buffer' that XP uses. > Increasing the buffer, then allow XP to sort the directory again. > > I know I can manually sort each time, but that is a pain... > > It has nothing to do with a "buffer", the list is read and the files are sorted. If any info on the directory is stored, it's probably done the idiotic MS why using a "desktop.inf" file. You can set your folder options and have all folders use those settings, otherwise you have to set each folder seperately. You can have one or the other, not both. Of course you can sort by name, filetype, etc. The files are always sorted, I've never seen any way to view them unsorted, but you need to set the folder up the way you want and apply it to all folders. -- | Ric | From devnull at spamcop.net Sat Apr 2 09:53:23 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Sat Apr 2 10:00:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Question on weg site process Message-ID: We have a new, small but growing client for web site/graphics that needs/wants to have a few things accomplished automatically if it's practical First they are a small but up scale photo studio and would like to load studio samples from their office computer (DSL connection) automatically. Staff is great on photo work but have more productive fish to fry than to lean the tricks of the internet. (KISS principal applies -- if it's simple/easy/fool proof they'll do it otherwise ...) These would be seasonal samples, changed on average once a quarter and open to public view. Second they want to load preview shots to the site for each individual client with a pass word for the client family to access. These will be up for 2 to 6 weeks and the client's extended family will be able to select prints size and quanties from this page. Right not the only option is for me to collect what is to up loaded and do the deed for them. This is ok for the seasonal uploads as I can get them far enough in advance. The client up loads are a logistical nightmare due to work schedules, etc. The last requirement is to block down loads/printing, if that be practical, otherwise the samples will have to be low resolution which may have some effect on sales. Web site is prepared in Dream MX Any help or direction to where I can find what I need (assuming it's available). TIA FP brother_rabbit @ hotmail.com (remove spaces) FWIW I'm fighting a kidney stone (some day this too will pass ) and will be checking the group sporadically so if there are questions understand the delay in responding From nttp.sc.s.g at bigsleep.org Sat Apr 2 16:59:47 2005 From: nttp.sc.s.g at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Sat Apr 2 12:00:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: On 02 Apr 2005 Frog Prince entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d2mbr7$1ng$1@news.spamcop.net: > > First they are a small but up scale photo studio and would like to > load studio samples from their office computer (DSL connection) > automatically. Staff is great on photo work but have more productive > fish to fry than to lean the tricks of the internet. (KISS principal > applies -- if it's simple/easy/fool proof they'll do it otherwise > ...) > I know what you mean. Well, too many ifs, if you don't want to die early from an ulser, don't even try to automate this. Make them have to do something to get them up there, a script or batch file that just FTP uploads everything in a directory. > Second they want to load preview shots to the site for each individual > client with a pass word for the client family to access. These will > be up for 2 to 6 weeks and the client's extended family will be able > to select prints size and quanties from this page. > That's no problem, depending on the OS the server is running, easy. Here we got the upload thing again, well someone's going to have to learn how to double-click an icon, I'm afraid. Still, all this info can be uploaded at once and the server can "figure it out". > > The last requirement is to block down loads/printing, if that be > practical, otherwise the samples will have to be low resolution which > may have some effect on sales. > "Hey, here's a photo, Oh sorry, you can't have that, give it back". Hey, don't upload anything you don't want to give out, you know if you give out your eMail you just might get some spam. I don't see what the problem is with just giving out previews, if you want people to know what the full size version looks like, just have some free samples that aren't worth anything. Any method that attempts to "prevent image theft" is just going to make it harder on some users to view them. What you really want is to prevent /other/ sites from linking to them, and that can be done. > > Any help or direction to where I can find what I need (assuming it's > available). > I could give some ideas if you were running FreeBSD/ Apache. -- | Ric From devnull at spamcop.net Sat Apr 2 18:52:05 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Sat Apr 2 19:00:05 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: "Blammo" | > | > First they are a small but up scale photo studio and would like to | > load studio samples from their office computer (DSL connection) | > automatically. Staff is great on photo work but have more productive | > fish to fry than to lean the tricks of the internet. (KISS principal | > applies -- if it's simple/easy/fool proof they'll do it otherwise | > ...) | > | | I know what you mean. | Well, too many ifs, if you don't want to die early from an ulcer, don't | even try to automate this. Make them have to do something to get them up | there, a script or batch file that just FTP uploads everything in a | directory. I've not done any formal coding since Fortan so where might I find a useful script/batch file that would not cause more problems than it would solve. Remember these are Right brained types and if the end result doesn't look good and just like they want it to look ... I'm in trouble. | > Second they want to load preview shots to the site for each individual | > client with a pass word for the client family to access. These will | > be up for 2 to 6 weeks and the client's extended family will be able | > to select prints size and quanties from this page. | > | | That's no problem, depending on the OS the server is running, easy. | Here we got the upload thing again, well someone's going to have to learn | how to double-click an icon, I'm afraid. | Still, all this info can be uploaded at once and the server can "figure it | out". | | > | > The last requirement is to block down loads/printing, if that be | > practical, otherwise the samples will have to be low resolution which | > may have some effect on sales. | > | > | | I could give some ideas if you were running FreeBSD/ Apache. Honestly don't know what the host is running. (I'm in a steep learning curve here and have more projects to 'come up to speed' that I have better sense) I did find this and would appreciate a quick review and opinion if it would do the job. BTW the doc gave me some new pain meds, only caution I'm not to drive anything more complicated than the TV remote. FP From devnull at devnull.spamcop.net Sun Apr 3 18:30:02 2005 From: devnull at devnull.spamcop.net (Heidz) Date: Sun Apr 3 17:35:14 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? Message-ID: Or actually, sales......My hard drive is making scraping noises again, second one to go bad in five years. Gateway says I can buy a new one for $65, but there is no home tech to install it, and when I asked if there were instructions for installation that came with it, she gave me a link telling how to install Windows 2k! After asking several times how this HD was going to get installed and was I expected to know how to do it, she say once I plug it in I can reinstall my install disks. Then she tells me once I get the HD I can log on and they will guide me through the installation. HELLLOOOOOOO, won't my hard drive be disconnected at the time? I asked what country she was in, she said Phillipines....considering she could not answer the question 'how will this hard drive get installed', that doesn't surprise me. So what do I do? Is installing a hard drive difficult for the non-nerd? Alright, I'm semi-nerdy, but I've never done much more than install software and memory. From nttp.sc.s.g at bigsleep.org Sun Apr 3 23:45:25 2005 From: nttp.sc.s.g at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Sun Apr 3 18:50:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: On 02 Apr 2005 Frog Prince entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d2nbeo$j2q$1@news.spamcop.net: > > I've not done any formal coding since Fortan so where might I find a > useful script/batch file that would not cause more problems than it > would solve. Remember these are Right brained types and if the end > result doesn't look good and just like they want it to look ... I'm in > trouble. > Well rather than make a script to upload, there is SendToFtp, which I've used just for this purpose. If they know how to use the right-click menu in Windows Explorer, then you're in business. A review - http://www.mrzone.com/freeware/sendtoftp.html However you need to be able to set up FTP usernames and passwords on the server. If you can't do that, perhaps they already have FTP access (if it's their site, and only their site, or they already have access to their htdocs), otherwise you'll still have to upload the images or create a web form for that. > > Honestly don't know what the host is running. (I'm in a steep > learning curve here and have more projects to 'come up to speed' that > I have better sense) > Well I can figure that out if I had a URL. > I did find this and would appreciate a quick > review and opinion if it would do the job. > Again, you'll need to install something on the server. Looks like it requires PHP, but the site gives little info, maybe it's there, but it's not obvious. Personally I've considered using Mozile, actually I have installed the server side version and got it working, but Mozile is more interested in the Mozile client side. I prefer this method because it pretty much requires Firefox or Mozilla (it actually only requires support of the CSS user-modify, which IE doesn't support). The client side version would require a Mozilla browser and the Mozile extension. I would prefer to require someone to use a Mozilla browser rather than a MS browser. But there are many contentEditable page editors out there, several are free I'm sure. But I really don't think they will upload new images for you, you kinda need that function. I think they use content already on the server, but I don't know what options they may have. But here you have a learning curve again, for example Mozile is pretty easy to use, especially if you have ever created a web page, but for those that know nothing about it there may be a few things to learn, especially when you have to get new images on the site. If you have to teach them how to write a web page, might as well just let them use Dreamweaver. Just allowing them to edit a section of a page is a great idea, but how are they going to create new pages. Personally I'm afraid to give my job away to some program. Now what I did with a truck broker site is to use what they already had. They were eMailing photos on request and sending out an inventory list via fax on a regular basis. I had them save the inventory list as text onto the FTP server, this is pretty easy because they had Office which includes a FTP client, so the file got saved right where I needed it. I created an HTML template, and a script filled in the web pages based on the inventory contents. They could upload new photos from a web form or use the SendToFtp program. Now the photo name just needed to match the VIN number (even a partial match). Now while the flyspeck thing might be able to do some of the work for you, it won't be able to do everything, you still have the problem of creating directories for customers to get their photos from. With Apache or ProFTP it's easy to create .htaccess files for just this purpose. Most of this work can be automated, either from Cron (*NIX systems), or a Perl or PHP script executed from a web form. Now there is one area that I have to constantly edit, and I'm getting tired of that and I want to use Mozile, or more likely I'll just make a web form that they can edit. Currenty they eMail me this info and I update the site. I think in this case I'll just create an "Edit" page where they use the normal web form that edits a file, and this file is included on the web page using Server Side Includes (that's Apache). The only thing they need to know is how to get to the edit page, the script itself can deal with any mistakes they make. I've seen many different scripts you can get that do specific things, like generate image galleries, but not likely to fill all your needs. > BTW the doc gave me some new pain meds, only caution I'm not to drive > anything more complicated than the TV remote. > What if you have a complicated TV remote? -- | Ric From nttp.sc.s.g at bigsleep.org Sun Apr 3 23:56:49 2005 From: nttp.sc.s.g at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Sun Apr 3 19:00:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: On 03 Apr 2005 Heidz entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d2pne1$p96$1@news.spamcop.net: > So what do I do? Is installing a hard drive difficult for the > non-nerd? Alright, I'm semi-nerdy, but I've never done much more than > install software and memory. > Not really, but I think Gateway will do it for you, but you have to send them the computer. Otherwise a Google search for "install new hard drive" turns up all sorts of sites like http://www.pcworld.com/howto/article/0,aid,47370,00.asp Also I believe some harddrive manufacturers offer a utility that transfers your data for you, seems that Gateway would offer some tool like this. Seems that IBM or Maxtor had such a utility. You are correct that once you remove the old drive there is not much you can do. You will have to have both drives installed and transfer the data over, before you can remove the old one. -- | Ric From devnull at spamcop.net Sun Apr 3 23:20:56 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Sun Apr 3 22:40:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: "Blammo" | | > BTW the doc gave me some new pain meds, only caution I'm not to drive | > anything more complicated than the TV remote. | > | | What if you have a complicated TV remote? I use a modified version of the channel search option my dad used: In this case I ask my 4 y.o. grand daughter to press the correct button. From notformail0404 at comcast.net Mon Apr 4 01:32:38 2005 From: notformail0404 at comcast.net (Gunter Herrmann) Date: Mon Apr 4 00:35:07 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi! Blammo wrote: > Also I believe some harddrive manufacturers offer a utility that transfers > your data for you, seems that Gateway would offer some tool like this. > Seems that IBM or Maxtor had such a utility. > > You are correct that once you remove the old drive there is not much you > can do. You will have to have both drives installed and transfer the data > over, before you can remove the old one. One option is to get a Linux cd and use dd. Assuming both drives are on the primary adapter they are /dev/hda and /dev/hdb dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/hdb bs=16M will copy all of the first drive (if - input file )to the second drive (of - output file) in chunks (bs - block size) of 16 MByte. HTH -- Gunter Herrmann Naples, Florida, USA From devnull at devnull.spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 11:01:08 2005 From: devnull at devnull.spamcop.net (Spamvireslayer) Date: Mon Apr 4 10:05:09 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: "Blammo" wrote in message news:Xns962DA243D5037blammo@216.154.195.61... > > Not really, but I think Gateway will do it for you, but you have to send > them the computer. No way I'm shipping it anywhere, things get lost, stolen, damaged, and I'd probably be out one computer by the time it showed up again. > > Otherwise a Google search for "install new hard drive" turns up all sorts > of sites like > http://www.pcworld.com/howto/article/0,aid,47370,00.asp > > Also I believe some harddrive manufacturers offer a utility that transfers > your data for you, seems that Gateway would offer some tool like this. > Seems that IBM or Maxtor had such a utility. Data transfer is not a big issue, I have stuff backed up on Cd that I can just copy over and the other stuff I'd reinstall to start fresh, I'd be more worried about the mechanical stuff, and maybe the OS and getting that installed correctly. From rcarlton at spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 10:45:54 2005 From: rcarlton at spamcop.net (Rick Carlton) Date: Mon Apr 4 12:50:02 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Spamvireslayer wrote: > Data transfer is not a big issue, I have stuff backed up on Cd that I can just copy > over and the other stuff I'd reinstall to start fresh, I'd be more worried about the > mechanical stuff, and maybe the OS and getting that installed correctly. Mechanically, it's not tough - though it can be intimidating the first time. It's also empowering when you realize thhat aa PC reaally is just a glorified toaster. The drive cables - both power and signal - are keyed so they only fit the correct way. And, if you'd like to save yourself the love of reinstalling, a copy of Norton Ghost will take the entire old drive and clone it to the new one. CompUSA has this for $20 after rebates - which if you amortize into time saved, might be worth it. If you're adverse to doing the work yourself, you can get a BestBuy or CompUSA to do it for you. Or a tech at a local computer shop. Scopee them out like aanyone else doing work for yoou and if they don't feel right - try a national franchised group like ComputerMoms.com. As a rule - for $60, you should be able to get at least a 120GB drive - possibly after rebate. CompUSA currently has a 160GB drive for $70, which is close. Lastly, parts are parts. There's no need to buy a new drive from Gateway when you can generally do better for the same money at any of the above mentioned stores. Or newegg.com etc. From rcarlton at spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 11:09:41 2005 From: rcarlton at spamcop.net (Rick Carlton) Date: Mon Apr 4 13:10:12 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Frog Prince wrote: > I use a modified version of the channel search option my dad used: In this > case I ask my 4 y.o. grand daughter to press the correct button. I'm sorry to hear of your pain. Hoping that the meds and good karmic thoughts will help you to be rid of the stones. Dumb question regarding this issue - are they running Macs? If so, a .Mac subscription includes most - if not all - of what you're talking about, allows them to mount the .Mac volume on their Mac (or Windows XP box) and drag and drop. It's $99/yr - though routinely discounted to $70/yr. Includes 250MB storage (though I understand that's about to jump) and is an all around good service for non-technical and/or people who need to publish quickly. You can map external domain names to it, etc just like any other service. Another option would be Flickr or Ofoto, though they are less graceful integration-wise IMHO. This isn't as fun aand geeeky as other options, but depending on your client - might be a good choice. From borgholio at storymind.com Mon Apr 4 12:01:16 2005 From: borgholio at storymind.com (Borgholio) Date: Mon Apr 4 14:05:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Rick Carlton wrote: > Spamvireslayer wrote: > >> Data transfer is not a big issue, I have stuff backed up on Cd that I >> can just copy >> over and the other stuff I'd reinstall to start fresh, I'd be more >> worried about the >> mechanical stuff, and maybe the OS and getting that installed correctly. > > > Mechanically, it's not tough - though it can be intimidating the first > time. It's also empowering when you realize thhat aa PC reaally is just > a glorified toaster. > > The drive cables - both power and signal - are keyed so they only fit > the correct way. > > And, if you'd like to save yourself the love of reinstalling, a copy of > Norton Ghost will take the entire old drive and clone it to the new one. > CompUSA has this for $20 after rebates - which if you amortize into time > saved, might be worth it. > > If you're adverse to doing the work yourself, you can get a BestBuy or > CompUSA to do it for you. Or a tech at a local computer shop. Scopee > them out like aanyone else doing work for yoou and if they don't feel > right - try a national franchised group like ComputerMoms.com. > > As a rule - for $60, you should be able to get at least a 120GB drive - > possibly after rebate. CompUSA currently has a 160GB drive for $70, > which is close. > > Lastly, parts are parts. There's no need to buy a new drive from > Gateway when you can generally do better for the same money at any of > the above mentioned stores. Or newegg.com etc. No need to buy Ghost. If it's a common name-brand hard drive (Maxtor, Fujitsu, Seagate, Western Digital, etc...) You can download a FREE utility from their websites that will copy your data from the old drive to the new one. Painless. :) From devnull at devnull.spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 15:21:47 2005 From: devnull at devnull.spamcop.net (Spamvireslayer) Date: Mon Apr 4 14:25:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: "Rick Carlton" wrote in message news:d2rr03$qne$1@news.spamcop.net... > > Mechanically, it's not tough - though it can be intimidating the first > time. It's also empowering when you realize thhat aa PC reaally is just > a glorified toaster. > > The drive cables - both power and signal - are keyed so they only fit > the correct way. I could imagine that, but never having done it, I don't necessarily want to experience it the hard way! We have a guy who has done geek stuff locally for us in our office, but at $85 an hour, prolly 2 hours, it'll cost more than the hard drive. > > And, if you'd like to save yourself the love of reinstalling, a copy of > Norton Ghost will take the entire old drive and clone it to the new one. > CompUSA has this for $20 after rebates - which if you amortize into time > saved, might be worth it. Might be worth it, but since I hosed up the last OS install, I wouldn't mind starting fresh. My copy of ME blew up, I tried to fix, no fix. Tried to reinstall, unable to reinstall, got a copy of 2K and installed that, unfortunately did not pick 'clean install' from the menu so I have two OS's on my pc right now. Doesn't seem to be a problem, but I could happily lose all the ME crap. > > As a rule - for $60, you should be able to get at least a 120GB drive - > possibly after rebate. CompUSA currently has a 160GB drive for $70, > which is close. > > Lastly, parts are parts. There's no need to buy a new drive from > Gateway when you can generally do better for the same money at any of > the above mentioned stores. Or newegg.com etc. The reason I went to Gateway is I don't want to mess about with compatibility problems, if I buy a new drive somewhere else and it doesn't work with the motherboard or something I'll be SOL, at least Gateway will be likely to send me something that will work. I could upgrade my memory too, If it doesn't matter, then I might just look elsewhere. Or splash out on a new PC. There's those Dell thingies for $500 and change.......but with Dell you get India...... From devnull at spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 15:16:19 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Mon Apr 4 14:25:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: "Rick Carlton" wrote in message news:d2rscm$res$1@news.spamcop.net... | Frog Prince wrote: | > I use a modified version of the channel search option my dad used: In this | > case I ask my 4 y.o. grand daughter to press the correct button. | | | I'm sorry to hear of your pain. | | Hoping that the meds and good karmic thoughts will help you to be rid of | the stones. | | Dumb question regarding this issue - are they running Macs? In this case no but whatever we go for needs to be OS independant. | | If so, a .Mac subscription includes most - if not all - of what you're | talking about, allows them to mount the .Mac volume on their Mac (or | Windows XP box) and drag and drop. It's $99/yr - though routinely | discounted to $70/yr. This is another cost center that they'd prefer to avoid. Heck if they'd pay $99 per year I'd do it myself. | Includes 250MB storage (though I understand that's about to jump) and is | an all around good service for non-technical and/or people who need to | publish quickly. You can map external domain names to it, etc just like | any other service. | | Another option would be Flickr or Ofoto, though they are less graceful | integration-wise IMHO. | | This isn't as fun aand geeeky as other options, but depending on your | client - might be a good choice. From devnull at spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 15:18:34 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Mon Apr 4 14:25:08 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: "Rick Carlton" | | Lastly, parts are parts. There's no need to buy a new drive from | Gateway when you can generally do better for the same money at any of | the above mentioned stores. Or newegg.com etc. Especially since buying from Gateway/Dell etc is likely going to carry a 1 year vs. 3 year warranty. From rcarlton at spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 12:53:59 2005 From: rcarlton at spamcop.net (Rick Carlton) Date: Mon Apr 4 14:55:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: OK then, my recommendation is http://www.flickr.com/ Can't guess that it will always be free...especially now that Yahoo is buying them. But it seems to meet your requirements in terms of features and cost. From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 15:35:20 2005 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (WazoO) Date: Mon Apr 4 15:40:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: "Heidz" wrote in message news:d2pne1$p96$1@news.spamcop.net... > > So what do I do? Is installing a hard drive difficult for the non-nerd? > Alright, I'm semi-nerdy, but I've never done much more than install software > and memory. Dropped you an e-mail. From devnull at spamcop.net Mon Apr 4 17:13:49 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Mon Apr 4 16:25:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: "Rick Carlton" wrote in message news:d2s2g8$uvk$1@news.spamcop.net... | OK then, my recommendation is http://www.flickr.com/ | | Can't guess that it will always be free...especially now that Yahoo is | buying them. | | But it seems to meet your requirements in terms of features and cost. Won't work as this is a professional studio. Using something like Yahoo is a no no. Perhaps I was not clear. They have a web site host but need a simple way to transfer the proofs from their studio computer to the web site that is KISS compliant. From nobody at nowhere.invalid Tue Apr 5 11:25:51 2005 From: nobody at nowhere.invalid (Steven Maesslein) Date: Tue Apr 5 04:30:15 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:13:49 -0400, Frog Prince coughed into spamcop.geeks and left this in : > Perhaps I was not clear. They have a web site host but need a simple way to > transfer the proofs from their studio computer to the web site that is KISS > compliant. Set up an e-mail address on the server which feeds into a script that extracts the attachment and processes it as required (ImageMagick is your friend here, but I'm assuming it's a real server running some form of Unix and not MickeyMouseware). Then, all they have to do is e-mail the picture to that e-mail address. -- Steve For Mac, it's AppleTalk. For Novell, it's IPX. For Windows, it's a mystery. For the Internet, it's TCP/IP. Linux supports them all. From nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org Wed Apr 6 17:39:23 2005 From: nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Wed Apr 6 12:40:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: On 04 Apr 2005 Rick Carlton entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d2rscm$res$1@news.spamcop.net: > Dumb question regarding this issue - are they running Macs? > > If so, a .Mac subscription includes most - if not all - of what you're > talking about, allows them to mount the .Mac volume on their Mac (or > Windows XP box) and drag and drop. It's $99/yr - though routinely > discounted to $70/yr. > > This sounds similar to Samba http://www.samba.org/ which enables file sharing to work. I have this installed on my server, and may already be installed on your server, however I didn't mention this because of security concerns; I believe only the admin has access to this service (so the entire directory structure can be accessed), but then a VPS2 or dedicated server may allow you to create new user accounts for this. Still, that won't help you to update pages. -- | Ric | From nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org Wed Apr 6 17:45:05 2005 From: nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Wed Apr 6 12:50:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: On 04 Apr 2005 Rick Carlton entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d2rr03$qne$1@news.spamcop.net: > The drive cables - both power and signal - are keyed so they only fit > the correct way. > Not all drive cables are keyed, though I would expect Gateway cables to be, none of mine are. -- | Ric | From nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org Wed Apr 6 17:49:05 2005 From: nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Wed Apr 6 12:50:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: On 04 Apr 2005 Spamvireslayer entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d2s0jf$tv9$1@news.spamcop.net: > .......but with Dell you get India...... Hey, either we send money there, or they'll come here and build little mini-marts. ;-) -- | Ric | From pete+usenet at heypete.com Thu Apr 7 22:57:49 2005 From: pete+usenet at heypete.com (Pete Stephenson) Date: Fri Apr 8 01:00:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Mounting CB radio in car? Message-ID: This may sound like a somewhat odd request, but I figured I'd have as much hope at finding an answer here as anywhere... I have a 2003 Honda Insight. I also have a RadioShack car-mountable CB radio. I would like to combine the two, so as to have the radio mounted permanently in the vehicle with a permanently-mounted external antenna. Obviously, installing such a radio for this type of car is most unusual, and Google searches have returned no relevant results. I would be able to do most of the in-car installation myself, but would prefer to have any drilling of the car body to be done by a professional so as to avoid any messy problems, leaks, etc. Mounting the radio underneath the dash is an option, but vertical space for one's feet is somewhat limited and the radio would definitely impinge on that room. Mounting under the center of the dash would render the cupholders useless, which is unacceptable. The gear-shift lever (for an auto transmission), emergency brake, and little coin-holding bucket occupy the room between the seats. Mounting on the ceiling would be a possibility, but may interfere with headroom or visibility of the rearview mirror. Any suggestions on where to install the radio and how to go about doing the actual installation? Cheers! -- Pete Stephenson HeyPete.com From notgiven at nodomain.net Fri Apr 8 08:18:16 2005 From: notgiven at nodomain.net (C. S.) Date: Fri Apr 8 07:20:07 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Mounting CB radio in car? References: Message-ID: Sometime around Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:57:49 -0700, Pete Stephenson deemed it necessary to offer: > This may sound like a somewhat odd request, but I figured I'd have as > much hope at finding an answer here as anywhere... > Odd indeed, since your technical savvy has been demonstrated well in the past... :-) > I have a 2003 Honda Insight. I also have a RadioShack car-mountable CB > radio. I would like to combine the two, so as to have the radio mounted > permanently in the vehicle with a permanently-mounted external antenna. > > Obviously, installing such a radio for this type of car is most unusual, > and Google searches have returned no relevant results. > > I would be able to do most of the in-car installation myself, but would > prefer to have any drilling of the car body to be done by a professional > so as to avoid any messy problems, leaks, etc. > > Mounting the radio underneath the dash is an option, but vertical space > for one's feet is somewhat limited and the radio would definitely > impinge on that room. Mounting under the center of the dash would render > the cupholders useless, which is unacceptable. The gear-shift lever (for > an auto transmission), emergency brake, and little coin-holding bucket > occupy the room between the seats. Mounting on the ceiling would be a > possibility, but may interfere with headroom or visibility of the > rearview mirror. > > Any suggestions on where to install the radio and how to go about doing > the actual installation? > > Cheers! Judging by the images I'm able to find of the car's interior, it would appear that the best location may be inside or under the passenger-side glove box. Or similarly, mounted sideways to one side of the console next to the radio. Depending on the CB's dimensions, you might consider squeezing it into an unconventional spot, such as between a seat and the center console. Is an external antenna a must? I'm aware of splitters/adapters which allow connecting a standard radio and a CB to a typical auto antenna. This would eliminate any exterior drilling or other cutting, though I don't know if this leads to any sort of range/ performance loss of either device. I know that budget is typically an issue for you; given that, have you considered a unit that has all operating controls in the mike with a main unit that mounts under a seat or other out-of-the-way location(provided they're still even available)? From devnull at spamcop.net Fri Apr 8 08:36:36 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Fri Apr 8 07:40:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Mounting CB radio in car? References: Message-ID: Once owned a business that did this type of work. send me a link to a picture of the driver/passenger area (brother_rabbit @ hotmail.com) As to the antenna should not be a problem. again can you send me a pict of the front and rear of the car. More later as I'm out the door until late this evening. FP "C. S." wrote in message news:ltoc519v8kug7n4p5mgfalqrt7rb2d5hjm@4ax.com... | Sometime around Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:57:49 -0700, Pete Stephenson | deemed it necessary to offer: | | > This may sound like a somewhat odd request, but I figured I'd have as | > much hope at finding an answer here as anywhere... | > | | Odd indeed, since your technical savvy has been demonstrated | well in the past... :-) | | > I have a 2003 Honda Insight. I also have a RadioShack car-mountable CB | > radio. I would like to combine the two, so as to have the radio mounted | > permanently in the vehicle with a permanently-mounted external antenna. | > | > Obviously, installing such a radio for this type of car is most unusual, | > and Google searches have returned no relevant results. | > | > I would be able to do most of the in-car installation myself, but would | > prefer to have any drilling of the car body to be done by a professional | > so as to avoid any messy problems, leaks, etc. | > | > Mounting the radio underneath the dash is an option, but vertical space | > for one's feet is somewhat limited and the radio would definitely | > impinge on that room. Mounting under the center of the dash would render | > the cupholders useless, which is unacceptable. The gear-shift lever (for | > an auto transmission), emergency brake, and little coin-holding bucket | > occupy the room between the seats. Mounting on the ceiling would be a | > possibility, but may interfere with headroom or visibility of the | > rearview mirror. | > | > Any suggestions on where to install the radio and how to go about doing | > the actual installation? | > | > Cheers! | | Judging by the images I'm able to find of the car's interior, | it would appear that the best location may be inside or | under the passenger-side glove box. Or similarly, mounted | sideways to one side of the console next to the radio. | | Depending on the CB's dimensions, you might consider squeezing | it into an unconventional spot, such as between a seat and the | center console. | | Is an external antenna a must? I'm aware of splitters/adapters | which allow connecting a standard radio and a CB to a typical | auto antenna. This would eliminate any exterior drilling or other | cutting, though I don't know if this leads to any sort of range/ | performance loss of either device. | | I know that budget is typically an issue for you; given that, have | you considered a unit that has all operating controls in the mike | with a main unit that mounts under a seat or other out-of-the-way | location(provided they're still even available)? From pete+usenet at heypete.com Fri Apr 8 11:01:03 2005 From: pete+usenet at heypete.com (Pete Stephenson) Date: Fri Apr 8 13:05:20 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Mounting CB radio in car? References: Message-ID: In article , C. S. wrote: > Odd indeed, since your technical savvy has been demonstrated > well in the past... :-) *snerk* I may have knowledge about a specific range of things, but I lack knowledge in many (most?) things. I may know how the microchips and circuits in the radio cause it to transmit radio waves, but I have no idea how the heck to effectively attach it to the vehicle. :-P > Judging by the images I'm able to find of the car's interior, > it would appear that the best location may be inside or > under the passenger-side glove box. Or similarly, mounted > sideways to one side of the console next to the radio. Hmm. Inside the glove box (who keeps gloves in there anyway?) is out, as there's presently a fire extinguisher, some chemlights, trauma shears, latex gloves, and a three pound bag of change (for bridge tolls). Underneath might work -- I'll have to check to see how much room is available. > Depending on the CB's dimensions, you might consider squeezing > it into an unconventional spot, such as between a seat and the > center console. The console is somewhat sloped -- it has a flat top for the emergency brake and change-holding bin, but it is angled as it goes down to the seats. Still, that's a definite possibility. I just need to find out what lies underneath the carpet. The radio appears to be similar in size and design to , though the controls and microphone are of a different style. Mine has lots less whiz-bang features. > Is an external antenna a must? I'm aware of splitters/adapters > which allow connecting a standard radio and a CB to a typical > auto antenna. This would eliminate any exterior drilling or other > cutting, though I don't know if this leads to any sort of range/ > performance loss of either device. If it could be connected to the standard car antenna without a significant loss in gain or range, I would be most satisfied. It would maintain the overall lines of my car. However, I note that most CB antennas are at least three feet long. Presumably this is for the benefit of the radio waves which are quite low frequency. I'm not sure how much having a shorter antenna would affect this. > I know that budget is typically an issue for you; given that, have > you considered a unit that has all operating controls in the mike > with a main unit that mounts under a seat or other out-of-the-way > location(provided they're still even available)? Alas, I only have this unit and can't really afford a new one. And yes, budget is an issue for me. I do have a credit card, but I don't want to use it anymore. In fact, I've locked it in the safe so I can't use it when I'm out and about. So far, it's saved me from a few temptations. :-P I really need to start saving some money up, particularly when my expenses are low. -- Pete Stephenson HeyPete.com From noah.boddie at newsgroup.nospam Fri Apr 8 18:41:48 2005 From: noah.boddie at newsgroup.nospam (Dwayne Conyers) Date: Fri Apr 8 17:45:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Mounting CB radio in car? References: Message-ID: I had a CB in my car in the 1980's... I was a kid out of school in Texas and CB was the big thing. I found an antenna that combined AM/FM/CB (basically, the CB part was an extension on top of a regular antenna. I haven't seen these in ages but perhaps you can find one in Radio Shack or an auto parts store? A guy who lived nearby put two long CB antennas on the front bumpers of his car and tied them in an arc to his rear bumper... not very aesthetic and looked dangerous. :-{ In terms of the radio, my car (Renault Alliance) had no empty space under the radio console (all of my subsequent vehicles did have that empty space and it was simply used to hold coins, LOL). :-) For the Alliance, I drilled holes on the passenger side and mounted there. My rare passengers were a bit uncomfortable, but for those long lonely drives on the TX highway, it was perfect for me. -- I Shave With Occams Razor http://www.dwacon.com From rcarlton at spamcop.net Fri Apr 8 22:37:41 2005 From: rcarlton at spamcop.net (Rick Carlton) Date: Sat Apr 9 00:40:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Mounting CB radio in car? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Pete Stephenson wrote: > Any suggestions on where to install the radio and how to go about doing > the actual installation? Does thee haandset for the CB act as a remote for the head unit? If so, what about under one of the seats? Also, does the Insight support Bluetooth? Might be a way to trunk-mount the CB withaa Bluetooth transmitter and use the existing radio as the front-end. From rcarlton at spamcop.net Fri Apr 8 22:40:08 2005 From: rcarlton at spamcop.net (Rick Carlton) Date: Sat Apr 9 00:45:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Frog Prince wrote: > Perhaps I was not clear. They have a web site host but need a simple way to > transfer the proofs from their studio computer to the web site that is KISS > compliant. Been somewhat busy for a few days, wondering what you decided. If they are using Dreamweaver MX 2004, it has built-in FTP support for publishing the site. So, if they developed a template forr their customer proof gallery, they could place the images onto the page, hit the Publish button, and voila. This doesn't solve the maanaged access issue. From wb8tyw at qsl.network Sat Apr 9 02:41:21 2005 From: wb8tyw at qsl.network (John E. Malmberg) Date: Sat Apr 9 01:45:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Mounting CB radio in car? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Pete Stephenson wrote: > The radio appears to be similar in size and design to > 8508?v=glance&vi=pictures&img=14>, though the controls and microphone > are of a different style. Mine has lots less whiz-bang features. If you are not attached to that particular radio, there are models that allow everything to be controlled by the microphone, including an LED display in it. This allows the rest of the radio to be anywhere that you want. Small CB radios can also be found that can mount almost anywhere. The main difference in them is the quality of the receiver. The rest of the specifications are set by regulations, so are pretty close to the same for all models. Oh, I see below that cost is an object. > If it could be connected to the standard car antenna without a > significant loss in gain or range, I would be most satisfied. It would > maintain the overall lines of my car. > > However, I note that most CB antennas are at least three feet long. > Presumably this is for the benefit of the radio waves which are quite > low frequency. I'm not sure how much having a shorter antenna would > affect this. If you want the maximum range, you will put a 102 inch full size whip in the exact center of your car, and make sure that you have a good ground. Follow that by putting the 102 inch full size whip anywhere else on the car. Anything else will give you less range both on transmit or receive. I am not sure how much of a reduction that you will get by using a signal trap/splitter to share the car antenna. Generally the models that I have seen (and this was a while ago) were more expensive than just getting a separate antenna. The 102 inch whip antenna may also be the lowest cost option. It's size is the major hassle. On older cars, bumper clamp mounts where you make sure that a ground is well connected, will usually make the best compromise if you do not feel like drilling a hole in the top of your vehicle. The farther away from the center of the vehicle that you put the antenna, the more distorted the pattern of a chart of maximum effective range will be. On newer cars, what I have found is a trip to the hardware store will show up some metal brackets that can be bolted on the bottom of the car to extend out just a little behind the plastic bumper. And then the antenna can be bolted to that. When you sell the car, everything can be removed with no evidence that an antenna was ever there. If I where more clever, I would rig up a fold over mount that would retract under the bumper, motorized of course, so that the antenna would be hidden or safely stored when I did not want it to be seen. Because a full size whip is usually too big for aesthetics, the next best choice that use to be available was a half size white fiberglass whip. The antenna wire is embedded in a visible spiral on the antenna. The big disadvantage of that type of fiberglass whip is that it is not flexible. A trip through a car wash or other impact can destroy the antenna. Or the impact with the ceiling of a car repair bay. IIRC: full size whip and the 1/2 size fiber glass whip both use the same mount, and quick disconnects were available. The antenna length includes a spring which does not seem to do much as it is very stiff. Removing the spring makes it about the right length for 10M Amateur Radio communication. As near as I can tell the spring is mainly for looks. From this point on you can go with shorter antennas which will have a "load" coil to make them electrically equivalent to the longer antenna. They will not have the range of the other antennas as the length of the radiating element is the major factor. This allows a model known as a flip trunk mount, which mounts inside the trunk, and flips out when needed, but can be folded down when you either do not want the antenna to be seen or damaged. Magnetic mount antennas are also available. One thing to look at when purchasing antennas for CB radios is that there are also commercial and amateur radio services that can use the same antenna designs. You will find that some designs are only sold to CB radio operators, who are the least likely to understand what they are buying. Also if you really want the maximum range for a given antenna, you will need to tune it either by adjusting the length or the control on the matching network. The easiest way to measure the adjustments is by watching the signal strength of incoming signals as you make adjustments. For more advanced, an impedance bridge is used, but that also requires transmitting a small signal. You also have to consider that the best that you will probably get with vehicle to vehicle communications is about 8 to 10 miles, and that most people are going to be using the popular loading coil models. So you will probably be able to get about a 5 mile range with most antennas. The big range limiters are that you are close to the ground, and your vehicle is not well grounded. > Alas, I only have this unit and can't really afford a new one. And yes, > budget is an issue for me. I do have a credit card, but I don't want to > use it anymore. In fact, I've locked it in the safe so I can't use it > when I'm out and about. So far, it's saved me from a few temptations. :-P In some areas, all you need to do is let the people around you know that you are interested in a used CB or similar used electrical gadget, and things just show up that people want to get rid of. About the only used CB sets that have any real cash value are SSB models, or ones that people would buy because of marketing hype. > I really need to start saving some money up, particularly when my > expenses are low. For a home CB or 10M Amateur antenna, the best omni-directional that I have found so far is a home-made folded dipole made out of TV twin-lead and then stretched vertically with an RG59 balun. I have not figured out how to mount something like that on a passenger vehicle, as it is about 18' in length. -John wb8tyw@qsl.network Personal Opinion Only From devnull at spamcop.net Sat Apr 9 12:27:32 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Sat Apr 9 11:30:22 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: "Rick Carlton" | Frog Prince wrote: | > Perhaps I was not clear. They have a web site host but need a simple way to | > transfer the proofs from their studio computer to the web site that is KISS | > compliant. | | Been somewhat busy for a few days, wondering what you decided. | | If they are using Dreamweaver MX 2004, it has built-in FTP support for | publishing the site. So, if they developed a template for their | customer proof gallery, they could place the images onto the page, hit | the Publish button, and voila. | | This doesn't solve the managed access issue. Dreamweaver MX4 cost would give them apoplexy not to mention scare then to death trying to learn how to drive it. As a temporary measure we're going to do manual updates for $10 per session assuming no other maintenance or changes required. Still looking for a practical end user controlled process as I expect this to be an ongoing requirement and the our time is more valuable (>$10) spent doing other things. We're also considering building into the site a guesstimate (10-15?) dead pages that would be pass word access for them to used for loading current clients proofs. From nttp.sc.sg.fp at bigsleep.org Sun Apr 10 00:42:12 2005 From: nttp.sc.sg.fp at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Sat Apr 9 19:45:02 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Question on weg site process References: Message-ID: On 09 Apr 2005 Frog Prince entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d38sb3$oug$1@news.spamcop.net: > As a temporary measure we're going to do manual updates for $10 per > session assuming no other maintenance or changes required. Still > looking for a practical end user controlled process as I expect this > to be an ongoing requirement and the our time is more valuable (>$10) > spent doing other things. > > We're also considering building into the site a guesstimate (10-15?) > dead pages that would be pass word access for them to used for loading > current clients proofs. > I don't have a lot of time myself, but if I had a URL I could advise or possibly write something useful. I'll enable this address for a couple days. -- | Ric | From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Sun Apr 10 15:43:14 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Sun Apr 10 07:45:02 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SPEWS: A removal request of 222.233.52.0/24 (S3145) References: Message-ID: Speaking about the uncountable (more than petabytes I think) Internet, you couldn't find a worse place to post this article. That post looks like a terrible missed opportunity for April 1 I am not joining the flaming since I think your company doesn't deserve flaming even. At least, thank you for making me buy spamcop account and support them that way... One day, an army of lawyers will knock your door and believe me, they will take everything except your underwear. You have no clue how evil those suits can be. You deserved it. Just a matter of time. Mark my word for future. Ilgaz Ocal In article , wrote: > This is Hanaro anti spam center. > > Our customer's network 222.233.52.0/24 is currently listed in spews.org. We > fixed the spam problem in 222.233.52.0/24. 222.233.52.0/24 was listed in > SBL(Spamhaus.org), but was already delisted as soon as we fixed the problem > in this network. > > We would like to ask spews administrator to remove 222.233.52.0/24 from > their list. > > Thank you. > > Abuse Staff > abuse@hanaro.com From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Sun Apr 10 15:50:40 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Sun Apr 10 07:55:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Hardware for anti-spyware References: Message-ID: In article , "DC" wrote: > Are there any hardware appliances that can be installed at the gateway to > block spyware? I know they have similar for spam and viruses. Thanks. I only know eSafe appliance, seek it on web. I used their CPU monster "desktop" which was free back in the day, if it has not changed, we are speaking about pure dictatorship over clients here. :) It was using a lot of CPU and I guess its not a problem in appliance. Giving an example... User can NOT doubleclick an attachement in Outlook express. Also it will be immediately reported to admin to go and lecture user for 5 hours about viruses :) I used it in, 2001 or 2000, I am NOT sure if it has changed. Better read whitepapers. Also, thanks to reading spamcop technical reports :) I think they use http://www.ironport.com/ devices. I'd go for what spamcop uses. Note, I am a home user only and never worked with those "big" stuff. Ilgaz Ocal From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Sun Apr 10 15:53:32 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Sun Apr 10 07:55:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: In article , Blammo wrote: > On 03 Apr 2005 Heidz entered spamcop.geeks and left > news:d2pne1$p96$1@news.spamcop.net: > > > So what do I do? Is installing a hard drive difficult for the > > non-nerd? Alright, I'm semi-nerdy, but I've never done much more than > > install software and memory. > > > > Not really, but I think Gateway will do it for you, but you have to send > them the computer. > > Otherwise a Google search for "install new hard drive" turns up all sorts > of sites like > http://www.pcworld.com/howto/article/0,aid,47370,00.asp > > Also I believe some harddrive manufacturers offer a utility that transfers > your data for you, seems that Gateway would offer some tool like this. > Seems that IBM or Maxtor had such a utility. > > You are correct that once you remove the old drive there is not much you > can do. You will have to have both drives installed and transfer the data > over, before you can remove the old one. Also Seagate (http://www.seagate.com), speaking about software support... I was checking my seagate drive from web, via activeX in Internet explorer back in my PC days. Their documentation is general, not much shameless plugs and huge. I check the site when I have a question about HD in general. Ilgaz Ocal From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Sun Apr 10 16:09:55 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Sun Apr 10 08:10:02 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Dealing with Idiots References: Message-ID: After purchasing something I can'T remember from Allume (those Aladdin stuffit guys lost their name :)) I entered Ilgaz@spamcop.net to the web form which was needed, they aren't spammers btw... I had a strange error as "Due to abuse from that domain, we aren't accepting any adresses" So, it looks like a trend started or at least hit that company to give fake spamcop addresses, a childish way of protesting that form. It somehow hit me, a real customer of them. Imagine that. I had to give Yahoo and it accepted. Sorry, I thought it was normal for some reason and don't remember the exact thing. Of course, some may hate that company but there is nothing to suggest that they are spamming anyone. If I got mad to that point, I wouldn't give a fake address involving another company. There is a simple way. Do not use that product. :) I think it may be relevant. The attitude is (I guess) "If you try to spam me, you will spam spamcop admin so bad things will happen" Spamcop became big name, having respect from community, I think its a side effect. People think, when spamcop admin get spam mail, he does some high tech tricks and spammer machine blows :) Have a nice day Ilgaz Ocal In article , Steven Maesslein wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:19:28 -0500, DC coughed into spamcop.geeks and > left this in : > > > If I wanted to attempt legal action, could it be possible to trace their > > news postings or use the IP address captured by our web mail form to > > identify the person? > > I wouldn't bother. You're probably going to spend a lot of time and > effort only to find that the postings were made and your webform > accessed through an open proxy. From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Sun Apr 10 16:18:47 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Sun Apr 10 08:20:21 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] I need real usenet server (no bin needed) Message-ID: Hi, Back in the day, I was a frequent usenet user. Now moved to a cable ISP, they have no support for usenet and I thank god for it since they couldn't manage it already. I searched web for "free usenet", only pirate stuff appears, in fact results are flooded by those "open nntp list" lame webpages and if there is something like that, I can't find already. I used news.cis.dfn.de with a username/password generated to my legit mail (you can guess) but they are closed to people outside German academic network now (guess the reason!) I don't need mp3, pictures etc. I want plain text. Is there a service like that for free? The commercial ones speak about their DS-3 lines, super duper fastness etc and have price tags which costs more than spamcop mail. As you may guess, the "service" they advertise is not usenet, its binary groups/files. Hopefully someone knows such a server. BTW, those "open nntp" things are like open proxies, will be blocked from any seriously administered news server. Ilgaz Ocal From devnull at spamcop.net Sun Apr 10 09:59:57 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Sun Apr 10 09:05:17 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: I need real usenet server (no bin needed) References: Message-ID: "Ilgaz Ocal" wrote in message news:Ilgaz-44358D.15184710042005@news.spamcop.net... | Hi, | | Back in the day, I was a frequent usenet user. Now moved to a cable ISP, | they have no support for usenet and I thank god for it since they | couldn't manage it already. | | I searched web for "free usenet", only pirate stuff appears, in fact | results are flooded by those "open nntp list" lame webpages and if there | is something like that, I can't find already. | | I used news.cis.dfn.de with a username/password generated to my legit | mail (you can guess) but they are closed to people outside German | academic network now (guess the reason!) | | I don't need mp3, pictures etc. I want plain text. Is there a service | like that for free? | | The commercial ones speak about their DS-3 lines, super duper fastness | etc and have price tags which costs more than spamcop mail. | | As you may guess, the "service" they advertise is not usenet, its binary | groups/files. | | Hopefully someone knows such a server. BTW, those "open nntp" things are | like open proxies, will be blocked from any seriously administered news | server. | | Ilgaz Ocal Try news.excelonline.com they're based in the USA, Texas I think, and seem to be reasonabley reliable. FP From wb8tyw at qsl.network Sun Apr 10 10:45:14 2005 From: wb8tyw at qsl.network (John E. Malmberg) Date: Sun Apr 10 09:50:02 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Hardware for anti-spyware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ilgaz Ocal wrote: > > Also, thanks to reading spamcop technical reports :) I think they use > http://www.ironport.com/ devices. I'd go for what spamcop uses. Aside from Ironport's purchase of the spamcop.net reporting service, all the stuff that I have read indicates that the spamcop.net reporting service only uses open source software. The mail service appears to be owned by a separate person, and I do not know what they use. -John wb8tyw@qsl.network Personal Opinion Only From MikeE at ster.invalid Sun Apr 10 08:25:38 2005 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Sun Apr 10 10:25:02 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: I need real usenet server (no bin needed) References: Message-ID: Ilgaz Ocal wrote: > I used news.cis.dfn.de with a username/password generated to my legit > mail (you can guess) but they are closed to people outside German > academic network now (guess the reason!) news.cis.dfn.de is a very excellent news service. It is also NIN, news individual.net which is also a very excellent text news service which was also free up until Apr 1, when it became a 'minimal' pay server, at 10 euros/year. It may become an even more excellent news service, because there are some distinct advantages to a news provider to require some form of payment identity registration. When NIN became pay and required using FirstGate to pay them, I started 'sampling' other free and nearly free news servers, some of which opened themselves up to additional registrations temporarily to meet the needs of people seeking free news as a result of NIN becoming pay. Currently I am using the free or nearly free versions of news.x-privat.org, news.shared-secrets.com, news.readfreenews.net, and free.teranews.com on a try it and see basis. I think NIN at 10 euros a year is a good buy. http://news.individual.net/ There are other good ones free or almost free, where almost free is something like $3 forever. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Sun Apr 10 19:29:16 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Sun Apr 10 11:30:25 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: I need real usenet server (no bin needed) References: Message-ID: Hi, Thanks for information. You can imagine the nightmare I had when I searched "usenet server" on yahoo. :) Will check frog prince's too Ilgaz Ocal In article , "Mike Easter" wrote: > Ilgaz Ocal wrote: > > I used news.cis.dfn.de with a username/password generated to my legit > > mail (you can guess) but they are closed to people outside German > > academic network now (guess the reason!) > > news.cis.dfn.de is a very excellent news service. It is also NIN, news > individual.net which is also a very excellent text news service which > was also free up until Apr 1, when it became a 'minimal' pay server, at > 10 euros/year. It may become an even more excellent news service, > because there are some distinct advantages to a news provider to require > some form of payment identity registration. > > When NIN became pay and required using FirstGate to pay them, I started > 'sampling' other free and nearly free news servers, some of which opened > themselves up to additional registrations temporarily to meet the needs > of people seeking free news as a result of NIN becoming pay. Currently > I am using the free or nearly free versions of news.x-privat.org, > news.shared-secrets.com, news.readfreenews.net, and free.teranews.com on > a try it and see basis. > > I think NIN at 10 euros a year is a good buy. > http://news.individual.net/ There are other good ones free or almost > free, where almost free is something like $3 forever. From user at domain.invalid Sun Apr 10 13:04:14 2005 From: user at domain.invalid (User) Date: Sun Apr 10 13:05:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Netscape Web Mail Woes Message-ID: As if AOL/Netscape needs more problems. Now they just released a new web mail product and when I send mail to myself, my mail server rejects it with: >>>> 205.188.157.34 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net Funny, but tragic to say the least. From nobody at nowhere.invalid Sun Apr 10 20:25:18 2005 From: nobody at nowhere.invalid (Steven Maesslein) Date: Sun Apr 10 13:30:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Netscape Web Mail Woes References: Message-ID: On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 12:04:14 -0500, User coughed into spamcop.geeks and left this in : > As if AOL/Netscape needs more problems. Now they just released a new web > mail product and when I send mail to myself, my mail server rejects it with: > >>>>> 205.188.157.34 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net > > Funny, but tragic to say the least. It's blocked here too. It's been pouring 419 crap out. -- Steve guru, n: A computer owner who can read the manual. From heybub at gmail.com Sun Apr 10 15:37:29 2005 From: heybub at gmail.com (HeyBub) Date: Sun Apr 10 15:40:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: Heidz wrote: > > So what do I do? Is installing a hard drive difficult for the > non-nerd? Alright, I'm semi-nerdy, but I've never done much more than > install software and memory. Usually, not difficult. You will need a new hard drive, a screwdriver, and some cloning software. The cloning software either comes with the drive or can be downloaded, usually, from the manufacturer's site. 1. Strap the new drive as a slave. Hook up two cables (data and power) 2. Load the software. 3. Clone your original drive to the new drive. 4. Disconnect the old drive. 5. Strap the new drive as the master. 6. (optional) You can now strap the original drive as "slave" as use to store temp files until it croaks for good. None of the above works if you have a laptop. You're fortunate - IDE drives last about three years (24/7). (Fry's had a "Grand Opening" sale here this weekend. Hitachi 200GB drives for $60 (after rebates) ) From nobody at spamcop.net Mon Apr 11 12:56:27 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (magus kent) Date: Mon Apr 11 08:00:26 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: I need real usenet server (no bin needed) References: Message-ID: Ilgaz Ocal wrote in news:Ilgaz-44358D.15184710042005@news.spamcop.net: > Hi, > > Back in the day, I was a frequent usenet user. Now moved to a cable > ISP, they have no support for usenet and I thank god for it since they > couldn't manage it already. > > I searched web for "free usenet", only pirate stuff appears, in fact > results are flooded by those "open nntp list" lame webpages and if > there is something like that, I can't find already. > > I used news.cis.dfn.de with a username/password generated to my legit > mail (you can guess) but they are closed to people outside German > academic network now (guess the reason!) > > I don't need mp3, pictures etc. I want plain text. Is there a service > like that for free? > > The commercial ones speak about their DS-3 lines, super duper fastness > etc and have price tags which costs more than spamcop mail. > > As you may guess, the "service" they advertise is not usenet, its > binary groups/files. > > Hopefully someone knows such a server. BTW, those "open nntp" things > are like open proxies, will be blocked from any seriously administered > news server. > > Ilgaz Ocal I've read about this one: www.x-privat.org/join_en.php m.. From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Mon Apr 11 16:40:57 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Mon Apr 11 08:45:13 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: I need real usenet server (no bin needed) References: Message-ID: In article , magus kent wrote: > Ilgaz Ocal wrote in > news:Ilgaz-44358D.15184710042005@news.spamcop.net: > > > Hi, > > > > Back in the day, I was a frequent usenet user. Now moved to a cable > > ISP, they have no support for usenet and I thank god for it since they > > couldn't manage it already. > > > > I searched web for "free usenet", only pirate stuff appears, in fact > > results are flooded by those "open nntp list" lame webpages and if > > there is something like that, I can't find already. > > > > I used news.cis.dfn.de with a username/password generated to my legit > > mail (you can guess) but they are closed to people outside German > > academic network now (guess the reason!) > > > > Ilgaz Ocal > > I've read about this one: > > www.x-privat.org/join_en.php > > > m.. Hi, Have bought that "individual.net" for 10 euros/year. I was using it already and was happy with it. Sadly, I guess spammers abusing it made it non free for ordinary users. Its news.cis.dfn.de to be exact. I see many spamcop people using it btw. Maybe a team work between spamcop and them, e.g. promotion code would help both and of course we users. Money goes to some academy, not a commercial company so I selected it. Thanks for all help, it seems I really missed usenet :) Ilgaz Ocal From SCNews.5.myspamgobbler at spamgourmet.com Mon Apr 11 21:19:46 2005 From: SCNews.5.myspamgobbler at spamgourmet.com (Brian (SnSR)) Date: Mon Apr 11 23:25:18 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Spamvireslayer wrote: > "Rick Carlton" wrote in message > news:d2rr03$qne$1@news.spamcop.net... > >>Mechanically, it's not tough - though it can be intimidating the first >>time. It's also empowering when you realize thhat aa PC reaally is just >>a glorified toaster. >> >>The drive cables - both power and signal - are keyed so they only fit >>the correct way. > > > I could imagine that, but never having done it, I don't necessarily want to > experience it the hard way! We have a guy who has done geek stuff locally for us in > our office, but at $85 an hour, prolly 2 hours, it'll cost more than the hard drive. > >>And, if you'd like to save yourself the love of reinstalling, a copy of >>Norton Ghost will take the entire old drive and clone it to the new one. >>CompUSA has this for $20 after rebates - which if you amortize into time >>saved, might be worth it. > > > Might be worth it, but since I hosed up the last OS install, I wouldn't mind starting > fresh. My copy of ME blew up, I tried to fix, no fix. Tried to reinstall, unable to > reinstall, got a copy of 2K and installed that, unfortunately did not pick 'clean > install' from the menu so I have two OS's on my pc right now. Doesn't seem to be a > problem, but I could happily lose all the ME crap. > >>As a rule - for $60, you should be able to get at least a 120GB drive - >>possibly after rebate. CompUSA currently has a 160GB drive for $70, >>which is close. >> >>Lastly, parts are parts. There's no need to buy a new drive from >>Gateway when you can generally do better for the same money at any of >>the above mentioned stores. Or newegg.com etc. > > > The reason I went to Gateway is I don't want to mess about with compatibility > problems, if I buy a new drive somewhere else and it doesn't work with the > motherboard or something I'll be SOL, at least Gateway will be likely to send me > something that will work. I could upgrade my memory too, If it doesn't matter, then > I might just look elsewhere. Or splash out on a new PC. There's those Dell thingies > for $500 and change.......but with Dell you get India...... > > Here's something that I just ran across that you may find helpful, if you haven't already finished. There's a link on the page to a video of how to install a hard drive. The video is very professional and high quality ;). Well, maybe not, but it gets the points across. www.lexundesigns.com/LexunFreeware/Topics/Installing%20a%20Second%20Hard%20Drive.htm You can get a 2.4 GHz with 256 MB RAM and 40 Gig HD for $300. Monitor is extra. You need to go to the small business section of Dell to find this deal. Well shoot, I just looked at the new catalog that arrived this afternoon and that deal went up a hundred bucks. But still not a bad deal. dell.com/shopdellbiz E-VALUE code 64994-S40303q. Oh, I see why, it includes a 17" Monitor. Holler if you need some help. Brian From nttp.sc.sg at bigsleep.org Tue Apr 12 07:25:20 2005 From: nttp.sc.sg at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Tue Apr 12 02:30:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: On 11 Apr 2005 Brian (SnSR) entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d3fesd$7rs$1@news.spamcop.net: > Here's something that I just ran across that you may find helpful, if > you haven't already finished. There's a link on the page to a video of > how to install a hard drive. The video is very professional and high > quality ;). Well, maybe not, but it gets the points across. > Here is a site with some nice pictures illustrating how to deal with a broken computer. http://members.aol.com/spoons1000/break/index.html Activity 4 details how to fix your existing harddrive. BTW; if you have some scratched CDs, I can give you detailed instructions how to fix them, for good. -- | Ric | From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Tue Apr 12 09:32:18 2005 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Miss Betsy) Date: Tue Apr 12 09:30:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Rejection 5.6.1 Message-ID: What does this mean? Final-Recipient: rfc822;x@x Action: failed Status: 5.6.1 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host TIA Miss Betsy -- From MikeE at ster.invalid Tue Apr 12 08:43:19 2005 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Tue Apr 12 10:45:10 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Rejection 5.6.1 References: Message-ID: Miss Betsy wrote: > What does this mean? > That is a delivery status notification. > Final-Recipient: rfc822;x@x > Action: failed > Status: 5.6.1 = 'Media' not supported > Diagnostic-Code: smtp;554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote 554 5.6.1 = enhanced error code Depending upon where you read, that can be caused by the receiving filters being misconfigured or an 8 bit based conflict; here're 2 examples of snippages: Messages bounce with: "554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host" This occurs when mail is sent to a recipient with badly configured mail filtering systems, and is mostly seen when using webmail. This bounce message occurs when the receiving mailserver has a front-end filter installed which tells us it supports 8 bit MIME characters and accepts our message, but then cannot deliver the message to the backend server because that does not support 8 bit MIME. http://www.virtualnames.co.uk/faq.php3?id=8BITMIME When you send messages that contain binary MIME (8bitmime) parts, you receive the following text in an NDR: 554 5.6.1 Body type not supported by Remote Host. http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=895857 What was it you were trying to send, and what does the Content-Transfer-Encoding line say? -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Tue Apr 12 12:42:51 2005 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Miss Betsy) Date: Tue Apr 12 12:45:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Rejection 5.6.1 References: Message-ID: "Mike Easter" wrote in message news:d3gmmt$s0f$1@news.spamcop.net... > > What was it you were trying to send, and what does the > Content-Transfer-Encoding line say? > It was an ordinary email in OE, plain text. I can't look at the message source right now. Possibly because I pasted something from Word in the email? Miss Betsy From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Tue Apr 12 20:58:59 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Tue Apr 12 13:00:16 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Rejection 5.6.1 References: Message-ID: On 2005-04-12 19:42:51 +0300, "Miss Betsy" said: > "Mike Easter" wrote in message > news:d3gmmt$s0f$1@news.spamcop.net... >> >> What was it you were trying to send, and what does the >> Content-Transfer-Encoding line say? >> > > It was an ordinary email in OE, plain text. > I can't look at the message source right now. > > Possibly because I pasted something from Word in the email? > > Miss Betsy I bet it (OE) converted it to HTML for some reason and the recipient has filtered html mail. You should check OE preferences to make sure it doesn't send html mail, it loves it :) I mean, in case you don't use styled (bold etc) text while you write. I don't know the current version but I clearly remember they made entire usenet community mad defaulting the news sending format to HTML. Yes it happened. Have a nice day Ilgaz Ocal From me at privacy.net Tue Apr 12 20:19:35 2005 From: me at privacy.net (Tom Cumming) Date: Tue Apr 12 14:20:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: I need real usenet server (no bin needed) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 11/04/05 12:56, magus kent wrote: > I've read about this one: > > www.x-privat.org/join_en.php It works but its rather slow (not a patch on cis.dfn) However, someone on another newsgroup pointed me in the direction of: http://poczta.gazeta.pl/poczta/0,0.html It is actually a free email service (web and pop3), but they give you access to their news server (news.gazeta.pl) as an extra, using the same username/password as you use for your email account. The site's in Polish mind, but once you've filled in the signup form (I found an online polish-english dictionary ;) ) it carries all the normal english-speaking newsgroup hierarchies. From nobody at spamcop.net Tue Apr 12 16:47:43 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Sylvesterthekat) Date: Tue Apr 12 18:50:10 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] is anyone else having problems with the web? Message-ID: seems like maybe the domain name servers are on strike - sometimes sites will resolve, sometimes not and at any one time a site will resolve while at the exact same time another won't so it's unlikely to be my connection... thoughts? From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Tue Apr 12 20:04:50 2005 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Miss Betsy) Date: Tue Apr 12 20:05:09 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Rejection 5.6.1 References: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 That's what the message headers say. There is something about 8bit there. Who should I write to? The abuse desk of the person I am trying to email? Miss Betsy From MikeE at ster.invalid Tue Apr 12 18:44:02 2005 From: MikeE at ster.invalid (Mike Easter) Date: Tue Apr 12 20:45:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Rejection 5.6.1 References: Message-ID: Miss Betsy wrote: > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="Windows-1252" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 > That's what the message headers say. > > There is something about 8bit there. Yep. That's not what my OE headers say, which say I'm 7bit. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My mail plaintext sending configuration is -- International settings button: Default encoding Western European ISO But I haven't experimented with this issue to find out what I have to do to cause 8bit to be in there. That is, I don't know the answers to these questions we are raising. > Who should I write to? The > abuse desk of the person I am trying to email? There's probably some configuration you could adopt which would solve the problem, but you shouldn't have to do that. The other thing you could do would be to temporarily change over to base64 or uuencoding for the item to them. At least I think that would work. Those encoding schemes were designed to use 7bit ascii. -- Mike Easter kibitzer, not SC admin From devnull at devnull.spamcop.net Wed Apr 13 00:24:53 2005 From: devnull at devnull.spamcop.net (Heidz) Date: Tue Apr 12 23:30:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: is anyone else having problems with the web? References: Message-ID: "Sylvesterthekat" wrote in message news:d3hj6d$dgm$1@news.spamcop.net... > seems like maybe the domain name servers are on strike - sometimes sites > will resolve, sometimes not and at any one time a site will resolve while at > the exact same time another won't so it's unlikely to be my connection... > thoughts? Comcast has apparently shit the bed too, for the second time in less than a week, mail and web servers are both down. I think there must be some major failures going on. From bitbucket at spamcop.net Wed Apr 13 00:30:58 2005 From: bitbucket at spamcop.net (Heidz) Date: Tue Apr 12 23:35:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: "Brian (SnSR)" wrote in message news:d3fesd$7rs$1@news.spamcop.net... > Here's something that I just ran across that you may find helpful, if > you haven't already finished. There's a link on the page to a video of > how to install a hard drive. The video is very professional and high > quality ;). Well, maybe not, but it gets the points across. > > www.lexundesigns.com/LexunFreeware/Topics/Installing%20a%20Second%20Hard%20D rive.htm > > > You can get a 2.4 GHz with 256 MB RAM and 40 Gig HD for $300. Monitor is > extra. You need to go to the small business section of Dell to find this > deal. Well shoot, I just looked at the new catalog that arrived this > afternoon and that deal went up a hundred bucks. But still not a bad > deal. dell.com/shopdellbiz E-VALUE code 64994-S40303q. Oh, I see why, > it includes a 17" Monitor. > > Holler if you need some help. Saved, just in case........thanks. Well, here's the thing. While the internet was down, again, I decided to use the GW utility to try to scan and repair the drive. Last time it said "unrepairable errors" this time it moved a bunch of stuff and said "disk repaired, drive is now error-free". Why didn't it do that last time, I wonder? I'm suspicious, but plans to replace it are on temporary hold, it might crap out at any second.. ;) From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Wed Apr 13 04:17:06 2005 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Miss Betsy) Date: Wed Apr 13 04:15:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Rejection 5.6.1 References: Message-ID: "Mike Easter" wrote in message news:d3hpt8$h1a$1@news.spamcop.net... > Miss Betsy wrote: > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="Windows-1252" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 > > > That's what the message headers say. > > > > There is something about 8bit there. > > Yep. That's not what my OE headers say, which say I'm 7bit. > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > My mail plaintext sending configuration is -- International settings > button: Default encoding Western European ISO > > But I haven't experimented with this issue to find out what I have to do > to cause 8bit to be in there. That is, I don't know the answers to > these questions we are raising. > > > Who should I write to? The > > abuse desk of the person I am trying to email? > > There's probably some configuration you could adopt which would solve > the problem, but you shouldn't have to do that. > > The other thing you could do would be to temporarily change over to > base64 or uuencoding for the item to them. > It is cut and pasting from MS Word that causes the 8bit. If I have composed in the email, it is 7bit, but if I have cut and pasted from Word it is 8 bit. Thanks a lot! I never would have discovered that! Miss Betsy From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Wed Apr 13 12:13:26 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Wed Apr 13 04:15:09 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: is anyone else having problems with the web? References: Message-ID: On 2005-04-13 06:24:53 +0300, "Heidz" said: > > "Sylvesterthekat" wrote in message > news:d3hj6d$dgm$1@news.spamcop.net... >> seems like maybe the domain name servers are on strike - sometimes sites >> will resolve, sometimes not and at any one time a site will resolve while > at >> the exact same time another won't so it's unlikely to be my connection... >> thoughts? > > Comcast has apparently shit the bed too, for the second time in less than a > week, mail and web servers are both down. I think there must be some major > failures going on. I can verify, just seen some posts on cable newsgroup on "real" usenet :) I better steal and paste a legit looking solution ;) Ilgaz Ocal ____ http://199.166.24.10/.servers/ (http://support.open-rsc.org/.servers/) http://64.40.160.15/helpdesk/dns/ You can freely use any of these servers instead of Comcast's nameservers if you want to be able to see ALL the domain names on the net, not just the ones in the US Government controlled nameservers. You will, of course be able to see all the "old" domain names like .com, but you'll also be able to see all the ORSC new top level domains, too. 199.166.28.10 (PS0.NS2.VRX.NET) - Atlanta, Ga 199.166.29.3 (nl.public.rootfix.net) - Nederlands 199.166.31.3 (NS1.QUASAR.NET) - Orlando, FL, USA 199.5.157.128 (ASLAN.OPEN-RSC.ORG) - Detroit, MI, USA Also working: 4.2.2.1 (vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net) 4.2.2.2 (vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net) 199.166.24.1 [ns1.vrx.net] 204.80.125.130 [pine.higgs.net] Software (freeware) for those who want to do it the hard way... 'TreeWalk DNS' is a Domain Name Server program which fetches and converts Web Site human readable names into the numbered addresses your computer needs so that your browser, email, icq, and ftp programs can surf the Web. For Microsoft Windows? XP / 2000 /.NET /2003 workstations or servers. http://64.202.167.122 (http://ntcanuck.com/) From nobody at spamcop.net Wed Apr 13 08:17:48 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Sylvesterthekat) Date: Wed Apr 13 10:20:05 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: is anyone else having problems with the web? References: Message-ID: "Ilgaz Ocal" wrote in message news:d3ikb6$upv$1@news.spamcop.net... > > "Sylvesterthekat" wrote in message > > news:d3hj6d$dgm$1@news.spamcop.net... > >> seems like maybe the domain name servers are on strike - sometimes sites > >> will resolve, sometimes not and at any one time a site will resolve while > > at > >> the exact same time another won't so it's unlikely to be my connection... > >> thoughts? > > > > Comcast has apparently shit the bed too, for the second time in less than a > > week, mail and web servers are both down. I think there must be some major > > failures going on. > > I can verify, just seen some posts on cable newsgroup on "real" usenet :) > > I better steal and paste a legit looking solution ;) > > Ilgaz Ocal > Software (freeware) for those who want to do it the hard way... > 'TreeWalk DNS' is a Domain Name Server program which fetches and > converts Web Site > human readable names into the numbered addresses your computer needs so > that your > browser, email, icq, and ftp programs can surf the Web. For Microsoft > Windows® XP / > 2000 /.NET /2003 workstations or servers. > http://64.202.167.122 (http://ntcanuck.com/) Cool thanks! I've downloaded it and if things start to muck about again I'll for sure install it. Sounds like it may be worth installing anyway as it's supposedly faster. From nobody at spamcop.net Wed Apr 13 08:18:50 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Sylvesterthekat) Date: Wed Apr 13 10:20:17 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: is anyone else having problems with the web? References: Message-ID: "Heidz" wrote in message news:d3i3jt$n3c$1@news.spamcop.net... > > "Sylvesterthekat" wrote in message > news:d3hj6d$dgm$1@news.spamcop.net... > > seems like maybe the domain name servers are on strike - sometimes sites > > will resolve, sometimes not and at any one time a site will resolve while > at > > the exact same time another won't so it's unlikely to be my connection... > > thoughts? > > Comcast has apparently shit the bed too, for the second time in less than a > week, mail and web servers are both down. I think there must be some major > failures going on. Hmm, definitely sounds like there's a failure or more than one, somewhere. Things are ok here at the moment but that thing that Ilgaz posted looks like it may solve the problem if it crops up again. Although I assume that you have to have a good connection at first for it to gather the info in the first place. From nobody at spamcop.net Wed Apr 13 11:47:32 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Wed Apr 13 10:50:02 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: is anyone else having problems with the web? References: Message-ID: Ilgaz Ocal wrote: > You can freely use any of these servers instead of Comcast's > nameservers if you want to > be able to see ALL the domain names on the net, not just the ones in > the US Government > controlled nameservers. You will, of course be able to see all the > "old" domain names like > .com, but you'll also be able to see all the ORSC new top level > domains, too. > > 199.166.28.10 (PS0.NS2.VRX.NET) - Atlanta, Ga Couldn't connect to that one. > 199.166.31.3 (NS1.QUASAR.NET) - Orlando, FL, USA That one worked. Thx, saved for Sam Spade personal. From bitbucket at spamcop.net Wed Apr 13 23:22:23 2005 From: bitbucket at spamcop.net (Heidz) Date: Wed Apr 13 22:30:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: is anyone else having problems with the web? References: Message-ID: "Sylvesterthekat" wrote in message news:d3j9o8$9hn$1@news.spamcop.net... > > Hmm, definitely sounds like there's a failure or more than one, somewhere. > Things are ok here at the moment but that thing that Ilgaz posted looks like > it may solve the problem if it crops up again. Although I assume that you > have to have a good connection at first for it to gather the info in the > first place. Can you believe it's happening again tonight? I guess they've decide to shut the internet off at night or something..... From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Thu Apr 14 10:31:15 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Thu Apr 14 02:35:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: is anyone else having problems with the web? References: Message-ID: On 2005-04-14 05:22:23 +0300, "Heidz" said: > > "Sylvesterthekat" wrote in message > news:d3j9o8$9hn$1@news.spamcop.net... >> >> Hmm, definitely sounds like there's a failure or more than one, somewhere. >> Things are ok here at the moment but that thing that Ilgaz posted looks > like >> it may solve the problem if it crops up again. Although I assume that you >> have to have a good connection at first for it to gather the info in the >> first place. > > Can you believe it's happening again tonight? I guess they've decide to > shut the internet off at night or something..... Worse is, someone could take advantage of problems you live. E.g. distribute a trojan fixing stuff (!) etc. Comcast is a big ISP if I know right. Some people already suggest open proxies to surf web, in good will. Ilgaz Ocal From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Apr 14 10:31:33 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Sylvesterthekat) Date: Thu Apr 14 12:35:05 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: is anyone else having problems with the web? References: Message-ID: "Heidz" wrote in message news:d3kkav$1fr$1@news.spamcop.net... > Can you believe it's happening again tonight? I guess they've decide to > shut the internet off at night or something..... Probably the best time to fix something, if they're gonna fix it. I never got the opportunity to test whether it was the DNS cos it didn't fail again after I wrote some IP addresses down. I'm pretty sure that's what it was though, the connection was fine otherwise. From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Apr 14 10:33:23 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (Sylvesterthekat) Date: Thu Apr 14 12:35:09 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: "Heidz" wrote in message news:d3i3va$n6s$1@news.spamcop.net... > Saved, just in case........thanks. Well, here's the thing. While the > internet was down, again, I decided to use the GW utility to try to scan and > repair the drive. Last time it said "unrepairable errors" this time it moved > a bunch of stuff and said "disk repaired, drive is now error-free". Why > didn't it do that last time, I wonder? I'm suspicious, but plans to replace > it are on temporary hold, it might crap out at any second.. ;) Hmm... maybe next time disconnect from the internet before you try running drive scanning/repairing tools. Sometimes running processes cause errors when you do a disk scan and no doubt also interfere with repair procedures. From nobody at spamcop.net Thu Apr 14 14:36:33 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Thu Apr 14 13:48:55 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: Sylvesterthekat wrote: > Hmm... maybe next time disconnect from the internet before you try > running drive scanning/repairing tools. Sometimes running processes > cause errors when you do a disk scan and no doubt also interfere with > repair procedures. Absolutely. One time I was doing a full scale scan/repair/defrag of my 40 GB HD at home and it takes a couple hours so I went out and ran errands, expecting to get back to work on the puter when I got home. What I actually got was a multi page error log that the process had started and stopped umpteen million times without success because Atguard kept writing to a log file on the HD every time someone port probed me, and that crashed the routine ;-) P.S. Close your email program too, close anything that might do *anything*. From devnull at devnul.spamcop.net Thu Apr 14 16:23:38 2005 From: devnull at devnul.spamcop.net (Spamvireslayer) Date: Thu Apr 14 15:25:25 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: SHEESH! Is there anyone who doesn't outsource Tech Support? References: Message-ID: "indigo" wrote in message news:d3m9n3$ms$1@news.spamcop.net... > > > Sylvesterthekat wrote: > > Hmm... maybe next time disconnect from the internet before you try > > running drive scanning/repairing tools. Sometimes running processes > > cause errors when you do a disk scan and no doubt also interfere with > > repair procedures. > > Absolutely. One time I was doing a full scale scan/repair/defrag of my 40 GB > HD at home and it takes a couple hours so I went out and ran errands, > expecting to get back to work on the puter when I got home. What I actually > got was a multi page error log that the process had started and stopped > umpteen million times without success because Atguard kept writing to a log > file on the HD every time someone port probed me, and that crashed the > routine ;-) > > P.S. Close your email program too, close anything that might do *anything*. I have to disable everything, antivirus, Zone alarm, screensavers, etc, and without Zone alarm running there is no way I'd be connected to the internet, so it's a sure thing that I was disconnected from everything when I did it - it's a utility that you start from a DOS via a system CD anyway. Now there's noise coming from inside my pc, might be a noisy fan or it's the disk rotation crapping out. Why am I so calm.... From kenbrody at spamcop.net Fri Apr 15 13:39:42 2005 From: kenbrody at spamcop.net (Kenneth Brody) Date: Fri Apr 15 12:45:12 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Equalizing MP3 volume Message-ID: <425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net> Does anyone here know of a (preferrably freeware/shareware) utility which can equalize the volume of a set of MP3 files? Specifically, I have a set of recordings of teleconferences. Some of them are recorded at a much lower volume than the others. I would like to burn a CD to listen on the road, but if I crank up the volume enough to hear one file, I'll break my eardrums when the other one starts. Thanks. -- +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ | Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | | | kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include | +-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+ Don't e-mail me at: From nobody at spamcop.net Fri Apr 15 14:11:38 2005 From: nobody at spamcop.net (indigo) Date: Fri Apr 15 13:15:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Equalizing MP3 volume References: <425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net> Message-ID: Kenneth Brody wrote: > Does anyone here know of a (preferrably freeware/shareware) utility > which can equalize the volume of a set of MP3 files? Specifically, I > have a set of recordings of teleconferences. Some of them are > recorded at a much lower volume than the others. I would like to > burn a CD to listen on the road, but if I crank up the volume enough > to hear one file, I'll break > my eardrums when the other one starts. I *could* help you......but I can't remember the name of the CD burning software I have at home -- Nero's Ahead I think -- it came with my external DVD-RW. It has an option to do exactly what you want to do, and it also has an equalizer so you can boost or attenuate bass, midrange, and treble (about 10 frequencies) and some filters to get rid of hissing and pops (like from an LP recording). From TMHRVMFWREVN at spammotel.com Fri Apr 15 20:51:18 2005 From: TMHRVMFWREVN at spammotel.com (Canopus) Date: Fri Apr 15 15:55:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Equalizing MP3 volume References: <425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net> Message-ID: Kenneth Brody wrote on 15/04/2005 17:39:42:- > Does anyone here know of a (preferrably freeware/shareware) utility > which can equalize the volume of a set of MP3 files? Audacity http://audacity.sourceforge.net/about/ You may have to also download the Lame Encoder Library, an optional free download to enable full working with mp3 files. The beauty of Audacity, besides it being free, is that it doesn't install, just place the files where you want them and click on the exe or make a short cut to it. Rob From nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org Fri Apr 15 22:10:59 2005 From: nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Fri Apr 15 17:15:07 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Equalizing MP3 volume References: <425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net> Message-ID: On 15 Apr 2005 Kenneth Brody entered spamcop.geeks and left news:425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net: > Does anyone here know of a (preferrably freeware/shareware) utility > which can equalize the volume of a set of MP3 files? MP3Gain http://mp3gain.sourceforge.net/ Also see http://replaygain.hydrogenaudio.org/ I think I prefer Foobar2000 http://www.foobar2000.org/ which also includes ReplayGain. -- | Ric | From nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org Fri Apr 15 22:57:02 2005 From: nttp.sc.s at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Fri Apr 15 18:00:46 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Equalizing MP3 volume References: <425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net> Message-ID: On 15 Apr 2005 Blammo entered spamcop.geeks and left news:Xns96399059FBE45blammo@216.154.195.61: > I think I prefer Foobar2000 Oops, correction, I found MP3Gain more useful for equalizing levels. It shows clipping levels, very nice, you just have to try it to see. -- | Ric | From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Sat Apr 16 02:13:12 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz Ocal) Date: Fri Apr 15 18:15:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Equalizing MP3 volume References: <425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net> Message-ID: On 2005-04-15 19:39:42 +0300, Kenneth Brody said: > Does anyone here know of a (preferrably freeware/shareware) utility which > can equalize the volume of a set of MP3 files? Specifically, I have a set > of recordings of teleconferences. Some of them are recorded at a much > lower volume than the others. I would like to burn a CD to listen on the > road, but if I crank up the volume enough to hear one file, I'll break > my eardrums when the other one starts. > > Thanks. iTunes has that feature named "sound check", performs real fast as I saw it doing on 2300 mp3s. The problem is, I use iTunes on OS X and not sure about windows one quality. It also loves to copy files to its own folder :) I mean, for practical purposes. Ilgaz Ocal From TMHRVMFWREVN at spammotel.com Sat Apr 16 00:16:33 2005 From: TMHRVMFWREVN at spammotel.com (Canopus) Date: Fri Apr 15 19:20:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Equalizing MP3 volume References: <425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net> Message-ID: Blammo wrote on 15/04/2005 22:10:59:- > I think I prefer Foobar2000 http://www.foobar2000.org/ which also > includes ReplayGain. I was going to suggest that, but, I haven't put it back on my PC yet after reformatting and couldn't remember whether it equalised mp3 files during play or you could edit them and equalise them for playing on anything. I seem to remember it was the former, but, not sure now. Have to put it back on. Great player, about the only one that can play shorten (shn) files. Rob From nttp.sc.sg at bigsleep.org Sat Apr 16 01:47:16 2005 From: nttp.sc.sg at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Fri Apr 15 20:50:07 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Equalizing MP3 volume References: <425FEE4E.3DAECA4A@spamcop.net> Message-ID: On 15 Apr 2005 Canopus entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d3pi0g$nrr$1@news.spamcop.net: > Blammo wrote on 15/04/2005 22:10:59:- > >> I think I prefer Foobar2000 http://www.foobar2000.org/ which also >> includes ReplayGain. > > I was going to suggest that, but, I haven't put it back on my PC yet > after reformatting and couldn't remember whether it equalised mp3 files > during play or you could edit them and equalise them for playing on > anything. I seem to remember it was the former, but, not sure now. > Have to put it back on. Great player, about the only one that can play > shorten (shn) files. > It works pretty good, I think it does add the ReplayGain header to the files, but I would use the disk transport to write it to disk. I don't think it changes the actual level, not sure how well the header is supported. Like I said (in my second post), I like MP3Gain better. I combined mp3s from several different albums, equalized the gain for each album, then combined the albums and equalized the overall gain, and created a (large) album to burn to disk. I was hoping to preserve the original level (in relation to original album level), but remove any clipping, and of course make the entire disk with overall equal levels. Took me a while to figure it out (had to read the help files) but I got very good results. Also MP3Gain has a handy undo feature. -- | Ric | From nobody at devnull.spamcop.net Sat Apr 16 19:42:29 2005 From: nobody at devnull.spamcop.net (Glenn Daniels) Date: Sat Apr 16 18:45:03 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] encoded jscript spamitems Message-ID: After six months of no spamitems containing encoded jscript IFrame exploits, the perp has surfaced again. These are of no particular significance to most as the scripts will only run in unpatched email clients with open preview panes with jscript rendering enabled. Evenso, the scripts seem always to point to compromised servers which have been hacked, and the ISPs providing hosting to the servers welcome the courtesy notifies I provide them. Usually the hacked sites are shut down, cleaned up and secured within a few days The hacked sites are often set to provide free blind downloads of new Trojans, and the antivirus mavens welcome the samples I retrieve from the hacked servers and are forthcoming with new AV definitions. For those who actually happen across these jscripts in the course of their spam reporting activities, please post parse trackers in this thread and I will retrieve samples using the trackers. As "new" samples show up, I will provide notifies to ISPs hosting the hacked servers, retrieve samples of interest to submit to SARC. Because of the security issues involved, I may or may not immediately post a meaningful response to posted trackers but will look at the samples offered for jscripts not already investigated. I am not willing to expose to group the embarrassment of the ISPs and hacked servers involved, but I am agreeable to alerting the parties with direct interest in the security of the compromised servers. Also, I provide the information to the FTC as they in turn may have investigators with interest in the spamming hacker(s). Thanks, Glenn From nttp.sc.sg at bigsleep.org Sun Apr 17 06:32:14 2005 From: nttp.sc.sg at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Sun Apr 17 01:35:22 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: encoded jscript spamitems References: Message-ID: On 16 Apr 2005 Glenn Daniels entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d3s4bv$t0t$1@news.spamcop.net: > These are of no particular significance to most as the > scripts will only run in unpatched email clients with > open preview panes with jscript rendering enabled. > Jscript only works in Internet Explorer (somewhat in Opera), and any applications that use the MS HTML engine. That would be mainly Outlook Express. This encoding is a language that only IE understands. Script Decoder - http://www.virtualconspiracy.com/ -- | Ric | From avoozl at spamcop.net Sun Apr 17 07:34:27 2005 From: avoozl at spamcop.net (Chris F. Willoughby) Date: Sun Apr 17 09:35:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Goodbye, Old Friend... Computer Associate's E-Z Trust Anti-Virus References: <41FD38E6.FBDEEA98@sonnic.net> Message-ID: :-( I still use it.. but I agree with you about their website. They fubar'd it. Chris "Bill Turlock" <"Bill Turlock"@sonnic.net> wrote in message news:41FD38E6.FBDEEA98@sonnic.net... > > It was with sadness that last night I removed Computer Associate's E-Z > Trust Anti-Virus from my computer. > > > I have been using their software to protect my computer since the late > nineties. I started with their free Inoculate-It Personal Edition, and > have had nothing but praise for their products. I had never had a virus > get through, and only one false positive, in all that time! > > I had recommended it unequivocally to all my friends and family. > > When the free IPE was discontinued, I gladly paid their price for the > new E-Z, and the $10.00/year for definition updates. > > Earlier this month I had received an e-mail notice that my yearly > subscription was about to expire, and that I should go to their website > to get it renewed. > > The website is a maze of twisty little passages, all alike, impossible > for me to navigate, and in most places, nonfunctional for me. At one > point, it wanted me to enter my CC number on a non-SSL page! And good > luck on getting their on-line help desk function to work, it's a loop! > Talk to a human? Ain't gonna happen. > > And... now, the yearly definition updates subscription has gone up to > $20.00, and if that's not enough, they've gone over to the Dark Side... > a preference box for e-mail offers permission on the order page is > 'pre-checked'. > > > It's just too much, and I'm not going to take it any more. I've > researched my favorite forums for recommendations on the best free A/V, > and AVG seems to come up tops most of the time, so last night I blew out > E-Z and installed Grisoft's AVG. > > Goodbye, Old Friend. > > Bill From Ilgaz at spamcop.net Mon Apr 18 02:31:40 2005 From: Ilgaz at spamcop.net (Ilgaz) Date: Sun Apr 17 18:35:39 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Goodbye, Old Friend... Computer Associate's E-Z Trust Anti-Virus References: Message-ID: On 2005-04-17 16:34:27 +0300, "Chris F. Willoughby" said: > :-( > > I still use it.. but I agree with you about their website. They fubar'd it. > > Chris > > "Bill Turlock" <"Bill Turlock"@sonnic.net> wrote in message > news:41FD38E6.FBDEEA98@sonnic.net... >> >> It was with sadness that last night I removed Computer Associate's E-Z >> Trust Anti-Virus from my computer. >> >> >> I have been using their software to protect my computer since the late >> nineties. I started with their free Inoculate-It Personal Edition, and >> have had nothing but praise for their products. I had never had a virus >> get through, and only one false positive, in all that time! >> >> I had recommended it unequivocally to all my friends and family. >> >> When the free IPE was discontinued, I gladly paid their price for the >> new E-Z, and the $10.00/year for definition updates. >> >> Earlier this month I had received an e-mail notice that my yearly >> subscription was about to expire, and that I should go to their website >> to get it renewed. >> >> The website is a maze of twisty little passages, all alike, impossible >> for me to navigate, and in most places, nonfunctional for me. At one >> point, it wanted me to enter my CC number on a non-SSL page! And good >> luck on getting their on-line help desk function to work, it's a loop! >> Talk to a human? Ain't gonna happen. >> >> And... now, the yearly definition updates subscription has gone up to >> $20.00, and if that's not enough, they've gone over to the Dark Side... >> a preference box for e-mail offers permission on the order page is >> 'pre-checked'. >> >> >> It's just too much, and I'm not going to take it any more. I've >> researched my favorite forums for recommendations on the best free A/V, >> and AVG seems to come up tops most of the time, so last night I blew out >> E-Z and installed Grisoft's AVG. >> >> Goodbye, Old Friend. >> >> Bill If you do quick and dirty hack of replacing https with http, it works? Can't believe how many sites it worked ;) Well I understand your other concerns and can't tell anything. AVG is nice. Ilgaz Ocal From rwcs at spamcop.net Mon Apr 18 11:54:35 2005 From: rwcs at spamcop.net (BMW) Date: Mon Apr 18 10:55:04 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] FireFox Cookies Message-ID: My browser (FireFox 1.0.3) fails to accept the SpamCop cookie sometimes depending on its mood URL=mailsc.spamcop.net (Today not at all). There is an added interference in that I use ZoneAlarm 5.5.062.011 which likes to "approve cookies". My FireFox message is that my browser has failed to accept a cookie. The cookie manager will let me add spamcop.net and/or www.spamcop.net to the allow list BUT it won't let me exit via the OK button if I have added anything, if I cancel or close cookie dialog window nothing is saved. Often times if I use the webmail interface and then return to mailsc.spamcop.net things will be different. Does anyone know how to fix this? Thanks Bob From eddie at eddie.web Mon Apr 18 14:37:59 2005 From: eddie at eddie.web (eddie) Date: Mon Apr 18 13:40:06 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Verizon DSL Message-ID: I use speakeasy DSL as a backup to my cable connection. I have had it for years, dating back to flashcom days. They went belly-up and their "Father" Covad switched me over to speakeasy. The connection is an old-fashioned 384K and I recently noticed Verizon offering DSL for nearly 1/3 the speakeasy price so I called them. Not only cheaper, but they claim 3 meg! Well I am not counting megs, but the bucks are good, so I am in the process of switching over. Verizon's modem is newer and includes a router but it only has an RJ-11 input and my present DSL uses RJ-45 on both ends. The box coming into the house is RJ-45. Verizon was clueless when I called them. I guess I will have to make a cable with RJ-45 on one end and RJ-11 on the other side. Only two wires are used for the DSL input. I already have a box installed on the outside of my house with a splitter and filters but Verizon expects me to use my phone line to connect to their modem. Talk about thinking inside a box. It should be interesting when the equipment comes, and if I do get 3M/s for $30/month, it will be a fine backup system. I was thinking of calling speakeasy and asking them if they would up my speed to 3M and cut the price to $30, but I didn't want to embarass them. If Verizon works, for the price I will be happy, since I rarely use it anyway. Just another toy, I guess. But I once read that he who has the most toys at the end is the winner :) One thing: I don't expect the same tech service from Verizon as I get from speakeasy, but again, it's really a secondary, backup system for when the cable goes dead. -- Once movie theaters gave out steak knives Today they confiscate them From devnull at spamcop.net Mon Apr 18 15:53:34 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Mon Apr 18 14:55:19 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Verizon DSL References: Message-ID: "eddie" | I once read that he who has the most toys at the end is the winner :) But he has the most toys to play with *right now* has more fun From eddie at eddie.web Mon Apr 18 16:20:53 2005 From: eddie at eddie.web (eddie) Date: Mon Apr 18 15:25:05 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Verizon DSL References: Message-ID: On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:53:34 -0400, Frog Prince scratched out the following: > > "eddie" > | I once read that he who has the most toys at the end is the winner :) > > But he has the most toys to play with *right now* has more fun So you're saying you gotta do both??? :) -- Once movie theaters gave out steak knives Today they confiscate them From eddie at eddie.web Mon Apr 18 16:22:02 2005 From: eddie at eddie.web (eddie) Date: Mon Apr 18 15:25:12 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Adobe just bought Macromedia! Message-ID: A bit of a surprise but I think the end result will be good for users. http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/breaking/breakingnewsarticle.asp?feed=OBR&Date=20050418&ID=4376197 I wonder how the support will be divvied up? -- Once movie theaters gave out steak knives Today they confiscate them From nttp.sc.sg at bigsleep.org Mon Apr 18 22:11:34 2005 From: nttp.sc.sg at bigsleep.org (Blammo) Date: Mon Apr 18 17:15:09 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: FireFox Cookies References: Message-ID: On 18 Apr 2005 BMW entered spamcop.geeks and left news:d40hn9$vv5$1@news.spamcop.net: > My browser (FireFox 1.0.3) fails to accept the SpamCop cookie sometimes > depending on its mood URL=mailsc.spamcop.net (Today not at all). There > is an added interference in that I use ZoneAlarm 5.5.062.011 which likes > to "approve cookies". My FireFox message is that my browser has failed > to accept a cookie. The cookie manager will let me add spamcop.net > and/or www.spamcop.net to the allow list BUT it won't let me exit via > the OK button if I have added anything, if I cancel or close cookie > dialog window nothing is saved. Often times if I use the webmail > interface and then return to mailsc.spamcop.net things will be > different. Does anyone know how to fix this? > Try deleting all cookies (be sure to exit Firefox) and starting over again. I don't know, but they could have changed the cookie file format which could cause the problem. The Zonealarm Internet security crap can cause problems, I don't even see why you need that with Firefox. But the problem is you can't enable it for IE only. I pointed out the bugs to Zonealarm support, but they insist there aren't any. -- | Ric | From devnull at spamcop.net Mon Apr 18 18:02:09 2005 From: devnull at spamcop.net (Frog Prince) Date: Mon Apr 18 17:15:16 2005 Subject: [SpamCop-Geeks] Re: Verizon DSL References: Message-ID: "eddie" | > | I once read that he who has the most toys at the end is the winner :) | > | > But he has the most toys to play with *right now* has more fun | So you're saying you gotta do both??? :) As for me, I'm only worried about the toys I have to play with now, I'll leave the determination of my toys after d